Get Verified
Secure Your Website with Our Verification Badge

zeema.fund

Why is the trust score of zeema.fund very low?

The website Zeema.fund claims to be a crowdfunding platform for collective financing, particularly for startups and companies. It emphasizes easy access to capital for these entities and promises low-risk, high-profit opportunities for investors. However, several red flags and concerns can be identified:

1. **Unverifiable Claims:** The website makes bold claims about the success and profitability of its projects, such as specific amounts of investment, returns, and the number of investors. However, without verifiable evidence or independent confirmation, these claims should be treated with skepticism.

2. **Guaranteed High Returns:** Promising high returns, especially with specific percentages like 42%, 44%, or 46%, is a common tactic used by fraudulent investment schemes. Legitimate investments typically come with a degree of risk, and such high, guaranteed returns are highly unusual in the financial world.

3. **Use of Official-Sounding Language:** Phrases like “with the guarantee of Bank Melli Iran” and “with the approval of the Iran Fara Bourse Company” are used to create an impression of legitimacy. However, it’s important to independently verify these claims and not rely solely on the website’s assertions.

4. **Lack of Detailed Information:** While the website provides general information about the platform and its operations, it lacks specific details about the investment process, risk factors, and the legal and regulatory framework governing its activities.

5. **Overemphasis on Low Risk:** All investments carry some level of risk, and it’s unusual for a platform to repeatedly emphasize “low risk” without providing a comprehensive explanation of how this is achieved.

6. **Complex Investment Projects:** The website lists a wide range of investment projects, from nitrogen unit purchases to cancer drug production. The diversity and complexity of these projects raise questions about the platform’s expertise and focus.

7. **Lack of Independent Reviews or Testimonials:** Genuine investment platforms often feature independent reviews or testimonials from actual investors. The absence of such feedback on the website is a potential concern.

8. **Unusual Domain Name:** The use of a non-standard domain extension like “.fund” instead of more common extensions like “.com” or “.org” can be a tactic used by fraudulent websites to appear legitimate.

9. **High Pressure Sales Tactics:** Urging visitors to invest quickly, especially with claims of limited availability or high demand, is a common tactic used by fraudulent schemes to pressure people into making hasty decisions.

10. **Lack of Transparency:** Transparency is crucial in the financial sector, especially for investment platforms. The website should provide clear and detailed information about its operations, team, and regulatory compliance.

Given these concerns, it’s advisable to approach this website with caution. Before considering any investment, it’s essential to conduct thorough independent research, seek professional financial advice, and verify the legitimacy of the platform and its claims. Additionally, checking with relevant financial regulatory authorities in your jurisdiction can provide valuable insights into the platform’s credibility and compliance with financial regulations.”



the reasons behind this review :
Unverifiable Claims, Guaranteed High Returns, Use of Official-Sounding Language, Lack of Detailed Information, Overemphasis on Low Risk, Complex Investment Projects, Lack of Independent Reviews or Testimonials, Unusual Domain Name, High Pressure Sales Tactics, Lack of Transparency
Positive PointsNegative Points

  Website content is accessible

  No spelling or grammatical errors in site content

  Low review rate by AI

  Domain is new

  Archive is new

  Whois data is hidden

  Domain does not rank within the top 1M on the Tranco list.

How much trust do people have in zeema.fund?

0.0

Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Reliable
0
Trustworthy
0
Neutral
0
Suspicious
0
Untrustworthy
0