Get Verified
Secure Your Website with Our Verification Badge

How much trust do people have in wiktionary.org?

0.0

Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Reliable
0
Trustworthy
0
Neutral
0
Suspicious
0
Untrustworthy
0
wiktionary.org

Why is the trust score of wiktionary.org very high?

https://wiktionary.org redirected to https//www.wiktionary.org during the time we crawled it. Wiktionary is a reputable and reliable online dictionary and thesaurus. It is a collaborative project that aims to provide free, multilingual definitions and descriptions for words in various languages. The site is part of the Wikimedia Foundation, which also operates Wikipedia, and is known for its commitment to accuracy and neutrality. Wiktionary’s content is created and edited by volunteers, and it is subject to the same rigorous standards for verifiability and reliability as other Wikimedia projects. Users can contribute to Wiktionary by adding new entries, improving existing definitions, and providing citations for the information presented. The site’s open editing model allows for continuous updates and improvements, making it a valuable resource for language learners, researchers, and anyone seeking information about words and their meanings. Wiktionary’s commitment to free and open knowledge aligns with the principles of the broader Wikimedia movement, and its content is available under open licenses, allowing for widespread distribution and reuse. Overall, Wiktionary is a trustworthy and valuable resource for anyone looking for information about words and their meanings in multiple languages.”



the reasons behind this review :
Reputable and reliable source, Part of the Wikimedia Foundation, Commitment to accuracy and neutrality, Content created and edited by volunteers, Subject to rigorous standards for verifiability and reliability, Open editing model for continuous updates and improvements, Valuable resource for language learners and researchers, Content available under open licenses for widespread distribution and reuse, Aligns with the principles of the broader Wikimedia movement.
Positive PointsNegative Points

  Website content is accessible

  No spelling or grammatical errors in site content

  High review rate by AI

  Domain Age is quite old

  Archive Age is quite old

  Domain ranks within the top 1M on the Tranco list

  Whois data is hidden