seedscity.ir Reviews

The website seedscity.ir appears to be a high-risk website based on the following observations:

Domain Age: The domain age is not provided, which can be a red flag. Legitimate websites often have a history, while newly created sites can be more suspicious.

Domain Whois: The domain whois information is hidden, which is a common practice for potentially fraudulent websites. Legitimate businesses typically provide transparent contact information.

SSL Certificate: The SSL certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt, which is a legitimate certificate authority. However, the use of a free, basic SSL certificate does not guarantee the trustworthiness of a website.

Tranco Global Rank: The website has a Tranco global rank of 0, which indicates very low or no traffic. This is unusual for a legitimate, well-established website.

Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) Age: The website has an Internet Archive age of 2757 days, which suggests that it has been online for a significant period. However, the lack of accessible historical content is a concern.

Server Information: The website is hosted on a server with the IP address 91.207.205.38, which is associated with Asiatech Data Transmission company. The location is listed as Shiraz, Fars, IR. While this information alone is not indicative of a scam, it’s important to consider the hosting environment.

Content Accessibility: The intentional inaccessibility of the website’s content is suspicious. Legitimate websites typically want their content to be indexed by search engines for visibility.

Overall, based on the limited information available, the website seedscity.ir raises several red flags that suggest it may be a high-risk or potentially fraudulent site. It’s important to exercise caution and conduct further research or verification before interacting with or providing any personal or financial information to this website.”

the reasons behind this review :
Hidden domain whois information, Low or no traffic according to Tranco global rank, Intentional inaccessibility of website content, Use of a free, basic SSL certificate, Lack of transparent contact information, Unusual server location or hosting environment, Lack of historical content accessibility despite significant Internet Archive age.