sarsefilings.lat Reviews

https://sarsefilings.lat redirected to https//secure.sarsefiling.co.za during the time we crawled it. The website's URL is https://secure.sarsefiling.co.za/landing. The website's content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. We conducted a Google search, and no information about the site was found in the search results. Additionally, we checked the Google Web Cache, but there was no content available there either. Evaluate this website based on the provided parameters, taking into account the global rank from Tranco, domain name, domain age, SSL type, Internet Archive: Wayback Machine age, servers and IPs, and WHOIS information. The domain age is 6 days, and the WHOIS information is accessible. The SSL information shows that the organization is Let's Encrypt, the issuer is R11, and the type is DV. The Tranco global rank is 0, and the Internet Archive: Wayback Machine age is 0 days. The server information indicates that the website is hosted on sarsefilings.lat with the IP address 43.153.64.27 in Santa Clara, California, US. The coordinates are 37.3483, -121.9844, and the AS (Autonomous System) number is 132203 for Tencent Building, Kejizhongyi Avenue, 95051, America/Los_Angeles. Based on this information, the website appears to be suspicious. The domain is very new, which can be a red flag for potential scams. The intentional inaccessibility of the website's content and the lack of information in search results are also concerning. Additionally, the use of a generic SSL certificate from Let's Encrypt, while common, may not provide the same level of trust as certificates from well-known issuers. The lack of historical data in the Internet Archive is another potential red flag. It's important to exercise caution when dealing with websites that have these characteristics. It's advisable to verify the legitimacy of the website through other means, such as contacting the organization directly through official channels, before engaging in any transactions or providing sensitive information."

the reasons behind this review :
New domain age, Intentionally inaccessible content, Lack of information in search results, Use of a generic SSL certificate, Lack of historical data in the Internet Archive