ratuvirgo.com Reviews
is ratuvirgo.com legit or scam?The trust score of ratuvirgo.com is strongly low. Why?
The website ratuvirgo.com appears to be a scam. Here are the reasons:
New Domain: The domain was registered very recently, which is often a red flag for fraudulent websites. Legitimate websites are typically older.
Lack of Information: The website provides very little information about its owners or operators. Legitimate businesses usually have detailed “About Us” and “Contact” pages.
Unprofessional Design: The website’s design appears unprofessional, with low-quality graphics and a lack of polish. This is often a sign of a hastily created, and potentially fraudulent, website.
No Secure Connection: The website does not use a secure HTTPS connection. This means any information you enter on the site could be intercepted by third parties.
No Verifiable Reviews: There are no verifiable customer reviews or testimonials for the website. Legitimate businesses often have reviews on independent platforms.
Unrealistic Promises: The website makes unrealistic promises, such as guaranteed payouts regardless of the jackpot amount. This is a common tactic used by fraudulent lottery or gambling sites.
Lack of Official Affiliation: The website does not appear to be officially affiliated with any recognized lottery or gambling organizations. Legitimate sites usually have clear affiliations.
Poor Grammar and Spelling: The website contains numerous grammar and spelling errors, which is often a sign of unprofessionalism and potential fraud.
No Social Media Presence: There is no evidence of an active social media presence for the website. Legitimate businesses often engage with customers on social platforms.
No Physical Address: The website does not provide a physical address for their business. This lack of transparency is concerning.
It’s important to exercise caution when dealing with websites that exhibit these red flags. If you have any doubts about the legitimacy of a website, it’s best to refrain from providing any personal or financial information.”
the reasons behind this review :
New Domain, Lack of Information, Unprofessional Design, No Secure Connection, No Verifiable Reviews, Unrealistic Promises, Lack of Official Affiliation, Poor Grammar and Spelling, No Social Media Presence, No Physical Address
Positive Points | Negative Points |
---|---|
website content is accessible No Spell and grammar mistakes in site content | Low review rate by AI Domain is new Whois data is hidden Domain is not between 1M list of tranco |
How much trust do people have in ratuvirgo.com?
Domain age :
17 days
WHOIS data :
Hidden
Website :
RATUVIRGO.COM
Title :
Ratutogel | Link Login Ratutogel Resmi Terpercaya
Website Rank :
3545099
SSL certificate valid :
Valid
SSL type :
Low - Domain Validated Certificates (DV SSL)
SSL issuer :
Google Trust Services LLC
WHOIS registration date :
2024/03/07
IP : 104.21.62.63
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
IP : 172.67.220.167
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
Name :
NameCheap, Inc.
IANA ID :
1068
Register website :
http://www.namecheap.com
Phone :
+1.6613102107
Email :
abuse@namecheap.com
Target : samara.ns.cloudflare.com
IP : 162.159.38.160
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
Target : damian.ns.cloudflare.com
IP : 162.159.44.50
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
This website was last scanned on August 23, 2024
etherealsearch.com
https://etherealsearch.com redirected to https//ethereal.directory during the time we crawled it. The website https://etherealsearch.com/ has several red flags that suggest it may not be trustworthy: New Domain: The domain was registered...
nsandi.com
https://nsandi.com redirected to https//www.nsandi.com during the time we crawled it. NS&I (National Savings and Investments) is a UK government agency that offers savings and investment products to the public. It...
securelifepath.com
The website securelifepath.com appears to be a scam. Here are the reasons: Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, which is a common characteristic of many scam websites. It was...