notcoin.org Reviews

The website content is quite vague and doesn’t provide clear information about the project or its purpose. It uses terms like “study,” “memes,” “contests,” and “ecosystem,” which are not typical in the context of legitimate cryptocurrency projects. The lack of specific and professional language is a red flag.

Whitepaper and On-Chain Holders: While mentioning a whitepaper is common in the cryptocurrency space, the details provided about the on-chain holders (2.6 million holding less than $100) and the average hold time (2.6 months) are unusual and not typical of established or credible cryptocurrencies.

Token Burning: The claim of burning 233,537,251 tokens to manage supply and increase scarcity is not well-explained. Token burning can be a legitimate practice in some cryptocurrency projects, but the purpose and mechanism should be clearly outlined, which is not the case here.

Unclaimed Tokens and Pools: The mention of unclaimed tokens from a “notcoin clicker” and funds from pools for exploration and “random fun and stars” is highly irregular. Legitimate cryptocurrency projects do not typically use such language or concepts.

Big Burn Donations: The reference to “big burn donations” worth ~$6.9 million is not a standard practice in the cryptocurrency industry. The term “big burn donations” is not commonly used, and the lack of clear explanation is concerning.

Gateway 2024: The mention of “notcoin & beyond, the gateway 2024” on YouTube is vague and does not provide any substantial information about the project’s future plans or developments.

Overall, the content on the website raises several red flags and does not align with the typical language and practices of legitimate cryptocurrency projects. It’s important to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before engaging with any cryptocurrency, especially if the project’s details are unclear or unconventional.”

the reasons behind this review :
Vague and unprofessional language, Unusual details about on-chain holders and token hold time, Lack of clear explanation for token burning, Unusual concepts like unclaimed tokens from a "notcoin clicker" and "random fun and stars", Mention of "big burn donations" without standard industry context, Vague reference to "notcoin & beyond, the gateway 2024" on YouTube