How much trust do people have in


Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Why is the trust score of very low? redirected to https// during the time we crawled it. The website appears to be a scam. The content retrieved from Google search results is not related to the typical content of a legitimate website. Instead, it seems to be a mix of Chinese drama descriptions and movie titles, which is unusual for a website that claims to be a video streaming service. This discrepancy raises suspicion about the legitimacy of the site.

Additionally, the domain age of 1 year and 10 months is relatively young for a well-established and trustworthy video streaming platform. Legitimate streaming services often have a longer history and established reputation.

The absence of detailed domain whois information can also be a red flag. Legitimate websites typically have transparent and verifiable domain registration details, while the lack of this information can be a tactic used by fraudulent or suspicious websites to conceal their true identity.

The SSL certificate information provided (organization: Google Trust Services LLC, issuer: GTS CA 1P5, type: DV) seems to be valid and issued by a reputable certificate authority. However, it’s important to note that having a valid SSL certificate does not guarantee the overall legitimacy of a website.

The Tranco rank of 647,608 indicates that the website has relatively low traffic and may not be well-known or widely visited. This can be a concern, as popular and reputable streaming platforms typically have higher website traffic and visibility.

The Internet Archive Wayback Machine’s record of 667 days for the website suggests that it has been online for a significant period. However, the content and purpose of the site, as indicated by the retrieved content, still raise doubts about its legitimacy.

The server information ( / – 1 – San Francisco – California – US – 37.7621, -122.3971 – AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. – 94107 – America/Los_Angeles) provides technical details about the website’s hosting. While this information is standard for website operation, it does not directly indicate the legitimacy of the site.

In conclusion, based on the content retrieved and the domain age, the website appears to be a scam or at least highly suspicious. It’s advisable to exercise caution and consider alternative, more established platforms for video streaming to avoid potential risks such as malware, phishing, or financial fraud.”

the reasons behind this review :
Unrelated content to the website's claimed purpose, Young domain age, Absence of detailed domain whois information, Low website traffic and visibility, Suspicious content from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, Valid SSL certificate but not a guarantee of legitimacy, Server information is standard but does not indicate legitimacy
Positive Points Negative Points

  Website content is accessible

  Domain ranks within the top 1M on the Tranco list

  Low review rate by AI

  Domain is new

  Archive is new

  Whois data is hidden