new-generation-agency.com Reviews

The website content seems to be promoting a modeling agency, claiming to offer opportunities for people of various ages to become models for advertising, fashion, and other media. It mentions categories like 0-2 years, 2-15 years, 15-50 years, and 50+ years, suggesting that anyone can apply regardless of age. It also provides a detailed process for applying as a model, including uploading photos and personal information. The site emphasizes that almost anyone with confidence and a pleasant appearance has a chance to enter the world of advertising and fashion. It also encourages companies to use their platform to find models for various projects. The site claims to prioritize data protection and confidentiality, stating that model profiles and presentation books are only shared with selected agencies and companies after verification. It also mentions that the agency regularly visits different cities to select new models. The site provides a form for both model applications and client registrations, and it includes terms and conditions, privacy policy, and a data protection statement. It also mentions that the agency is based in Bucharest with offices across the country. The site’s content and promises should be approached with caution. Here are some reasons for concern: 1. Overly Inclusive Age Categories: While modeling agencies can represent a diverse range of models, the emphasis on such broad age categories, from 0-2 years to 50+ years, without specific focus areas (e.g., children’s modeling, senior modeling) is unusual. 2. Emphasis on Physical Appearance: The site’s repeated emphasis on physical appearance, confidence, and being “pleasant” could be a red flag. Reputable modeling agencies typically prioritize professionalism, talent, and diversity, rather than solely focusing on conventional attractiveness. 3. Simplified Application Process: The site’s claim that almost anyone can become a model and the simplified application process, which only requires a few photos and basic personal information, is not typical of legitimate modeling agencies. 4. Data Protection Claims: While the site mentions data protection and confidentiality, it’s important to verify the actual practices and policies in place. Legitimate agencies should have robust data protection measures and transparent policies. 5. Lack of Specific Client or Project Information: The site’s generic references to “companies” and “clients” without specific details about past projects, partnerships, or industry affiliations could be a concern. Legitimate agencies often showcase their work and client relationships. 6. Unverified Claims of Regular City Visits: The claim that the agency regularly visits almost every city in the country to select new models should be verified. Legitimate agencies may conduct casting calls or events, but this claim should be substantiated. 7. Free Job Postings for Clients: The offer of free job postings and casting calls for clients could be a potential risk, as it may attract less reputable individuals or organizations. Legitimate agencies typically have a vetting process for clients. 8. Lack of Industry Affiliations or Recognitions: The absence of any mention of industry affiliations, recognitions, or partnerships with established brands or organizations is notable. Legitimate agencies often highlight their industry connections. 9. Unusual Focus on “Real People”: The site’s emphasis on “real people” and the suggestion that traditional modeling standards don’t matter could be a departure from industry norms. While diversity and inclusivity are important, this messaging should be carefully evaluated. 10. High Volume of Model Applications: If the site encourages almost anyone to apply as a model, it could be a sign of a less selective or less professional approach. Reputable agencies typically have specific criteria and standards for model representation. It’s important to approach the site with caution and conduct thorough research before engaging with it. Look for independent reviews, check for any complaints or warnings from industry organizations, and consider reaching out to established modeling agencies for advice or verification.”

the reasons behind this review :
Overly Inclusive Age Categories, Emphasis on Physical Appearance, Simplified Application Process, Data Protection Claims, Lack of Specific Client or Project Information, Unverified Claims of Regular City Visits, Free Job Postings for Clients, Lack of Industry Affiliations or Recognitions, Unusual Focus on "Real People", High Volume of Model Applications