Get Verified
Secure Your Website with Our Verification Badge

How much trust do people have in nasdaqn.com?

0.0

Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Reliable
0
Trustworthy
0
Neutral
0
Suspicious
0
Untrustworthy
0
nasdaqn.com

Why is the trust score of nasdaqn.com very low?

The website content is highly suspicious and exhibits several red flags commonly associated with scam websites:

1. Lack of Detailed Information: The website provides vague and unverifiable information about its business operations, such as buying and selling currencies on major exchanges and earning profits. Legitimate financial companies typically provide comprehensive and transparent details about their services, investment strategies, and regulatory compliance.

2. Unrealistic Income Claims: The website prominently displays a list of user IDs and their purported "quantified income," which is likely a tactic to create a false sense of legitimacy and success. Such high and consistent income claims are unrealistic and commonly used in Ponzi schemes or investment scams.

3. Recruitment of Agents: The website's emphasis on recruiting agents worldwide is a common feature of pyramid schemes, where participants are incentivized to recruit others in exchange for financial rewards. This model is unsustainable and often leads to financial losses for the majority of participants.

4. Misleading Use of Official-Sounding Terms: The website uses terms like "financial supervisory bureau (MSB)" and "US license" to create an impression of regulatory approval and legitimacy. However, these terms are vague and may not accurately represent the company's regulatory status.

5. Lack of Verifiable License or Registration Information: While the website claims to have a US license and registered capital of $50 million, there is no verifiable evidence or specific details provided to confirm this information. Legitimate financial companies are typically transparent about their regulatory licenses and registration.

6. High-Risk Investment Recommendations: The website's suggestion that investing in the NSDQN platform is a "good idea to make a lot of returns on your investment" is overly optimistic and lacks the necessary risk disclosures. Responsible financial platforms provide balanced and realistic investment advice.

7. Generic and Inconsistent Content: The website's content is generic and lacks specific details about its investment strategies, risk management, and operational processes. Legitimate financial platforms typically provide in-depth and consistent information to build trust with potential investors.

8. Use of Well-Known Company Names: The website mentions well-known companies like Apple and Microsoft, possibly to create a false association with reputable entities. This tactic is often used in scam websites to appear more credible.

9. Lack of Independent Reviews or Testimonials: The website does not feature independent reviews or verifiable testimonials from actual users. Legitimate financial platforms often showcase authentic user feedback to build trust.

10. Longevity and Consistency of Income Claims: The website lists a large number of user IDs and their purported income, which may be an attempt to create a false sense of stability and success. In reality, consistent and high returns in financial investments are rare and often indicative of fraudulent schemes.

Based on these red flags, the website exhibits characteristics commonly associated with investment scams or fraudulent financial platforms. It is advisable to exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough research before engaging with such websites. Additionally, seeking advice from independent financial advisors or regulatory authorities can help in making informed decisions about investment opportunities."

the reasons behind this review :
Lack of Detailed Information, Unrealistic Income Claims, Recruitment of Agents, Misleading Use of Official-Sounding Terms, Lack of Verifiable License or Registration Information, High-Risk Investment Recommendations, Generic and Inconsistent Content, Use of Well-Known Company Names, Lack of Independent Reviews or Testimonials, Longevity and Consistency of Income Claims
Positive PointsNegative Points

  Website content is accessible

  No spelling or grammatical errors in site content

  Archive Age is quite old

  Low review rate by AI

  Domain is new

  Whois data is hidden