mangotele.com Reviews

Mangotele.com is a website that appears to be a telecommunications service provider, possibly based in Moscow, Russia. However, the lack of detailed information on the website and the limited content provided make it difficult to ascertain the legitimacy of the service. The website’s design is quite basic, and it lacks the professional polish typically associated with established and reputable telecommunications companies. Additionally, the absence of specific details about the services offered, pricing, and customer support can be a red flag.

The website’s domain age of over 23 years might initially suggest credibility. However, it’s important to note that scammers can sometimes acquire older domains to create a false sense of trustworthiness. Therefore, domain age alone is not a definitive indicator of legitimacy.

The lack of detailed SSL information is also concerning. SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificates are crucial for securing online transactions and protecting sensitive information. The absence of clear SSL details on the website could indicate a lack of proper security measures, which is especially worrying for a telecommunications service provider that may handle sensitive customer data.

The website’s server information, including its location in Moscow, Russia, and the associated AS (Autonomous System) number, provides some insight into its hosting infrastructure. However, this information alone does not confirm the legitimacy of the service.

The absence of specific details about the organization, issuer, and type of SSL certificate further raises doubts about the website’s security and trustworthiness. Legitimate websites typically provide transparent and verifiable SSL information to assure visitors of their commitment to data security.

The Tranco ranking of 25401 indicates that the website’s traffic rank is relatively low. While this could be due to various factors, including the website’s focus on a specific geographic region, it’s important to consider this in conjunction with other indicators of legitimacy.

The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine shows that the website has been archived for over 8,000 days. This long history could be seen as a positive sign, but it’s essential to conduct a thorough analysis of the archived content to ensure that the website has maintained a consistent and credible presence over time.

In summary, while the website’s long domain age and historical presence on the Internet might initially suggest credibility, several red flags, including the lack of detailed SSL information, limited website content, and the absence of specific service details, raise concerns about its legitimacy. It’s crucial to exercise caution and conduct further research, including seeking independent reviews and verifying the company’s credentials, before engaging with this telecommunications service provider.”

the reasons behind this review :
Lack of detailed information on the website, Basic website design, Absence of specific details about services offered, pricing, and customer support, Domain age alone is not a definitive indicator of legitimacy, Lack of detailed SSL information is concerning, SSL certificates are crucial for securing online transactions and protecting sensitive information, The absence of clear SSL details on the website could indicate a lack of proper security measures, Server information does not confirm the legitimacy of the service, The website's location and associated AS number provide some insight into its hosting infrastructure, but this alone does not confirm legitimacy, Absence of specific details about the organization, issuer, and type of SSL certificate raises doubts about security and trustworthiness, Legitimate websites typically provide transparent and verifiable SSL information, Tranco ranking of 25401 indicates relatively low traffic rank, It's important to consider this in conjunction with other indicators of legitimacy, The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine shows the website has been archived for over 8,000 days, Long history could be seen as a positive sign, but it's essential to conduct a thorough analysis of the archived content, Several red flags, including the lack of detailed SSL information, limited website content, and the absence of specific service details, raise concerns about its legitimacy, Exercise caution and conduct further research, including seeking independent reviews and verifying the company's credentials, before engaging with this telecommunications service provider