lockobank.ru Reviews

https://lockobank.ru redirected to https//www.lockobank.ru during the time we crawled it. The website lockobank.ru appears to be a scam. Several red flags indicate this:

1. Lack of Domain Age and Whois Information: The absence of domain age and whois information is a common tactic used by fraudulent websites to hide their identity and avoid accountability.

2. SSL Certificate Details: While the SSL certificate is valid and issued by a reputable organization (GlobalSign), it’s important to note that having an SSL certificate does not guarantee the legitimacy of a website. Scammers can also obtain SSL certificates to appear more trustworthy.

3. Server Information: The server information provided (lockobank.ru / 429-Array) is not typical for a legitimate banking website. It’s vague and doesn’t provide clear details about the hosting infrastructure.

4. Content Inconsistencies: The website’s content, particularly the mix of Russian and English, is unusual for a professional banking site. Legitimate financial institutions typically maintain consistent and professional content in the language of their target audience.

5. Lack of Verifiable Contact Information: Scam websites often provide limited or fake contact information. It’s essential for legitimate businesses, especially in the financial sector, to have transparent and easily verifiable contact details.

6. High-Risk Flag from Tranco: The website’s ranking on Tranco, a platform that assesses the trustworthiness of websites, is relatively high, indicating a potential risk.

7. Longevity on the Internet Archive: The fact that the website has been archived for a long time (8398 days) doesn’t necessarily indicate legitimacy. Scammers can create and maintain websites for extended periods to appear more credible.

Given these red flags, it’s advisable to exercise extreme caution when dealing with the website lockobank.ru. It’s recommended to verify the legitimacy of the bank through official and trusted sources before engaging in any financial transactions or sharing personal information.”

the reasons behind this review :
Lack of Domain Age and Whois Information, SSL Certificate Details, Server Information, Content Inconsistencies, Lack of Verifiable Contact Information, High-Risk Flag from Tranco, Longevity on the Internet Archive