kelmo.ch Reviews

The website kelmo.ch appears to be a high-risk site based on the following factors:

Inaccessible Content: The intentional inaccessibility of the website’s content is a red flag. It suggests that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index, which can be a tactic used by malicious or deceptive websites.

Lack of Information in Search Results: A Google search for the website did not yield any information in the search results. This is unusual for legitimate websites, as they typically have some online presence and visibility.

No Content in Google Web Cache: When checking the Google web cache, there was no content available for the website. Legitimate websites usually have some content cached by search engines.

Unknown Domain Age: The domain age is listed as “unknowndays,” which means it is difficult to determine how long the website has been in operation. Established and reputable websites often have a longer domain history.

Hidden Domain Whois Information: The domain whois information is hidden, which can be a tactic used by suspicious websites to conceal their ownership details.

Low Tranco Global Rank: The website has a low Tranco global rank of 0, which indicates that it is not a well-established or widely recognized site.

No Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) History: The website has no recorded history on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. Legitimate websites typically have a history of archived pages.

Server Information: The server information for kelmo.ch is listed as “429-Array,” which is not a standard or well-known server configuration.

SSL Certificate from Let’s Encrypt: While Let’s Encrypt is a legitimate certificate authority, the use of a basic Domain Validation (DV) certificate does not provide strong assurance of the website’s legitimacy.

Based on these factors, it is advisable to exercise caution when interacting with the website kelmo.ch. It is recommended to avoid providing any personal or sensitive information and to consider the possibility that the site may not be trustworthy.”