iarfconference.com Reviews

The website content provided is a classic example of a scam or fraudulent website. Here are some reasons why:

1. Poor Grammar and Language: The website content contains numerous grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, which is a common trait of scam websites. Legitimate organizations, especially those involved in academic or scientific fields, typically maintain professional and well-edited content.

2. Vague and Grandiose Claims: The website makes grandiose claims about its focus and impact, such as being the ‘only explanation that focuses exclusively on the interface between the science system and the environment at surfaces.’ These claims are vague and not substantiated with specific details or evidence.

3. Unverifiable Affiliations and Partnerships: The website mentions partnerships with prestigious organizations like Scopus, Inderscience, and UGC-approved journals. However, there is no way to verify these partnerships, and reputable organizations would typically provide clear evidence of such affiliations.

4. Lack of Specific Information: The website lacks specific details about past conferences, speakers, or scientific contributions. Legitimate conference websites usually provide comprehensive information about their history, previous events, and notable participants.

5. High Impact Indexing Database: The website lists numerous journals and claims to be indexed in high-impact databases like Scopus and Web of Science. However, these claims are not verifiable, and the website does not provide direct links to its publications in these databases.

6. Publication Assistance Services: The website offers publication assistance services, claiming to help researchers publish in high-impact journals. This is a common tactic used by predatory journals and publishers to exploit researchers for financial gain.

7. Unprofessional Contact Information: The website provides contact information in the form of a mobile phone number and a generic email address. Legitimate organizations, especially those involved in academic conferences, typically have professional domain-specific email addresses and office phone numbers.

8. Copyright Date: The website’s copyright date is listed as 2024, which is unusual for a website that is currently being accessed in 2022. This discrepancy could indicate an attempt to appear more established or legitimate than it actually is.

9. Inconsistent Focus: The website’s description of its focus is vague and inconsistent, using language that is more characteristic of marketing or promotional material rather than a clear scientific or academic focus.

10. High Number of Journals: The website lists an unusually high number of journals, which is atypical for a legitimate organization. This could be an attempt to create an appearance of authority and credibility.

It’s important to exercise caution when encountering websites with these characteristics, especially if they are soliciting financial transactions or personal information. Conducting further research, seeking independent verification of claims, and consulting with trusted colleagues or mentors in the relevant field can help in evaluating the legitimacy of such websites.”

the reasons behind this review :
Poor Grammar and Language, Vague and Grandiose Claims, Unverifiable Affiliations and Partnerships, Lack of Specific Information, High Impact Indexing Database, Publication Assistance Services, Unprofessional Contact Information, Copyright Date, Inconsistent Focus, High Number of Journals