h5.metamax.top Reviews

The website h5.metamax.top appears to be a high-risk site based on the following factors:

Domain Age: The domain age is not provided, which can be a red flag. Legitimate websites often have a history, while newly created sites can be associated with higher risk.
Domain Whois: The whois information is hidden, which is a common practice for suspicious or fraudulent websites. Legitimate websites typically have transparent whois information.
SSL Information: The SSL certificate is issued by AlphaSSL, which is a valid certificate authority. However, the use of a Domain Validated (DV) certificate means that the identity of the website owner has not been verified to the same extent as with Extended Validation (EV) certificates.
Global Rank: The website has a low global rank according to Tranco, which is a tool for ranking websites based on their traffic and page views. This can be an indicator of low credibility or visibility.
Internet Archive: Wayback Machine Age: The website has no recorded history in the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Legitimate websites often have a history of archived pages, while newly created or suspicious sites may not.
Server Information: The website is hosted on d3lexokr3qwctd.cloudfront.net, which is a content delivery network (CDN) commonly used by legitimate websites. However, the use of a CDN does not guarantee the legitimacy of the site.
Content Accessibility: The intentional inaccessibility of the website's content is a red flag. Legitimate websites typically want their content to be indexed by search engines for visibility and accessibility.
Search Engine Results: A Google search did not yield any information about the site, which is unusual for legitimate websites. Lack of online presence can be a sign of a newly created or suspicious site.
Based on these factors, it is advisable to exercise caution when interacting with the website h5.metamax.top. It is recommended to avoid providing personal or sensitive information and to conduct further research or verification before engaging with the site."

the reasons behind this review :
Hidden domain whois information, Use of a Domain Validated (DV) SSL certificate, Low global rank according to Tranco, No recorded history in the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, Intentional inaccessibility of the website's content, Lack of information in search engine results