frogs.io Reviews

The website https://frogs.io appears to be a high-risk site based on the following observations:

Domain Age: The domain has been registered for 9 years and 9 days. While this is not inherently suspicious, it’s worth noting that older domains can sometimes be associated with more established and trustworthy websites.

Domain Whois: The whois information for the domain is hidden. While this is not necessarily a red flag on its own, it can be a tactic used by some less reputable websites to conceal their ownership details.

SSL Certificate: The site uses a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate, which is a widely used and reputable certificate authority. This is a positive sign for the security of the site.

Global Rank (Tranco): The site has a Tranco global rank of 0, which indicates that it is not among the top-ranked websites. However, this alone does not determine the legitimacy of the site.

Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) Age: The site has been archived by the Wayback Machine for 2818 days. This suggests that the site has been around for a significant amount of time and has been indexed by the Internet Archive.

Server Information: The site is hosted on a server with the IP address 199.59.243.226 in Tampa, Florida, USA. The server is associated with Amazon.com, Inc. This information is generally neutral and does not provide clear indications of the site’s trustworthiness.

Content Accessibility: The website’s content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. This lack of transparency can be a concern.

Search Engine Results: A Google search did not yield any information about the site in the search results. This lack of online presence can be a red flag, especially if the site claims to offer products or services.

Based on these observations, it’s important to approach the website with caution. While some aspects, such as the SSL certificate and the age of the domain, are positive indicators, the lack of transparency in the whois information and the intentional inaccessibility of the site’s content raise concerns. It’s advisable to conduct further research and consider these factors in the overall assessment of the site’s trustworthiness.”