Get Verified
Secure Your Website with Our Verification Badge

How much trust do people have in direct-link.net?

0.0

Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Reliable
0
Trustworthy
0
Neutral
0
Suspicious
0
Untrustworthy
0
direct-link.net

Why is the trust score of direct-link.net very low?

https://direct-link.net redirected to https//linkvertise.com during the time we crawled it. The content provided is a mix of various unrelated topics, including mentions of popular games like Minecraft and Roblox, as well as terms related to software and technology, such as "exploit," "gateway," and "download." This type of content is often associated with scams or potentially malicious activities, especially when it involves offering downloads or access to exclusive content. The use of terms like "exploit" in the context of gaming platforms like Roblox is particularly concerning, as it can be indicative of attempts to manipulate or cheat in online games, which is against the terms of service of most gaming platforms. Additionally, the repeated mention of "hydrogen" and "gateway" could be an attempt to create a sense of legitimacy or importance around a specific product or service, which is a common tactic in scams. The fact that the domain age is relatively long (6 years and 2 months) could be an attempt to appear more credible, but it's important to remember that even older domains can be used for fraudulent purposes. The use of a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate, while common and legitimate, does not necessarily guarantee the trustworthiness of the site. Let's Encrypt certificates are free and relatively easy to obtain, so their presence alone does not provide strong evidence of legitimacy. The fact that the domain whois information is hidden is also a red flag. Legitimate websites typically have transparent and publicly accessible whois information, which includes details about the domain owner. When this information is hidden, it can be a sign that the site owner is trying to conceal their identity, which is often associated with fraudulent or malicious intent. The use of Cloudflare as the hosting provider is not inherently suspicious, as Cloudflare is a reputable company that provides content delivery network (CDN) and DDoS protection services. However, it's worth noting that Cloudflare's services can be used by both legitimate and illegitimate websites, so the use of Cloudflare alone does not provide strong evidence of the site's trustworthiness. The fact that the site has been archived by the Wayback Machine for 7180 days (almost 20 years) is unusual and could be a sign of manipulation or falsification. The Wayback Machine is a tool that archives web pages, and it's highly unlikely that a site like this would have been around for nearly 20 years, especially given the content and the fact that the domain age is only 6 years and 2 months. This discrepancy raises serious questions about the authenticity of the archive data. In summary, the content provided, along with the hidden domain whois information, the potentially misleading use of terms like "exploit" and "gateway," and the unusual Wayback Machine archive age, all point to a high risk of this site being a scam or engaging in potentially malicious activities."

the reasons behind this review :
Unrelated mix of topics, Use of terms like "exploit" and "gateway" in gaming context, Attempt to create a sense of legitimacy with repeated mentions of "hydrogen" and "gateway", Long domain age could be an attempt to appear credible, Let's Encrypt SSL certificate does not guarantee trustworthiness, Hidden domain whois information is a red flag, Use of Cloudflare as a hosting provider is not inherently suspicious, Unusual Wayback Machine archive age raises questions about authenticity
Positive PointsNegative Points

  Website content is accessible

  No spelling or grammatical errors in site content

  Domain Age is quite old

  Archive Age is quite old

  Domain ranks within the top 1M on the Tranco list

  Low review rate by AI

  Whois data is hidden