delenofincorp.com Reviews
is delenofincorp.com legit or scam?The trust score of delenofincorp.com is very low. Why?
The website content is filled with generic and vague statements that are commonly used in scam websites. Phrases like ‘reliable secure innovative,’ ‘extensive experience,’ and ‘global user base’ are often red flags. The use of these terms without specific details or evidence to back them up is a common tactic in scam websites to create an illusion of credibility. Additionally, the repetition of certain phrases, such as ‘asset management is the cornerstone on which the finance industry is built and developed,’ is a technique used to fill space and create an appearance of legitimacy without providing meaningful information. The website’s emphasis on control over assets and money flowing wherever the user wants is also a common theme in financial scams, as it plays into people’s desires for financial freedom and control. The lack of specific, verifiable details about the company’s operations, team, and regulatory compliance is concerning. Legitimate financial institutions are typically transparent about these aspects of their business. The website’s mention of being the ‘top-ranking foreign exchange volume in Latin America’ is a bold claim that should be independently verified. Without evidence or third-party confirmation, such statements should be treated with skepticism. The user reviews provided on the website are likely fabricated or cherry-picked to present a positive image. Legitimate user reviews are typically found on independent platforms and can be both positive and negative. The website’s use of the term ‘asset management’ without clear explanations of how it is conducted and what safeguards are in place is another red flag. Legitimate financial institutions are transparent about their asset management practices and often provide detailed information for potential clients. The website’s emphasis on ‘shared success’ with clients and constantly improving professional capabilities is a common tactic in scam websites to create a sense of partnership and trust. However, without concrete evidence of success and improvement, these claims are empty. The website’s mention of ‘industry qualifications’ should be independently verified. Legitimate financial institutions often provide specific details about their qualifications, licenses, and regulatory compliance. The website’s use of the term ‘your preferred exchange’ is a marketing tactic to create a sense of exclusivity and trust. However, without independent verification and evidence of being a preferred exchange, this claim should be treated with caution. The website’s use of the term ‘compliant trading environment’ without specific details about regulatory oversight and compliance is concerning. Legitimate financial institutions are transparent about their regulatory compliance and often provide details about the regulatory bodies that oversee their operations. The website’s mention of ‘constantly improving our professional capabilities and service levels’ is a common tactic in scam websites to create a sense of ongoing improvement and commitment. However, without specific examples or evidence of this improvement, the claim is unsubstantiated. The website’s use of the term ‘introduction to Deleno IFC’ without providing clear, detailed information about the company’s history, leadership, and operations is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions often provide comprehensive information about their background and leadership. The website’s emphasis on ‘reliable secure innovative’ without specific details or evidence to back up these claims is a common tactic in scam websites. Legitimate financial institutions are transparent about their security measures and innovation. The website’s mention of ‘top-notch infrastructure’ without specific details or evidence is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions often provide detailed information about their infrastructure and security measures. The website’s use of the term ‘home’ without clear navigation or detailed information about the company’s services and operations is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions typically have a professional and comprehensive website structure. The website’s mention of ‘products’ without clear, detailed information about these products is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions provide comprehensive information about their products and services. The website’s mention of ‘security’ without specific details about their security measures and protocols is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions are transparent about their security practices. The website’s mention of ‘team service’ without specific details about their team and their qualifications is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions provide detailed information about their team and their expertise. The website’s mention of ‘value’ without specific details or evidence is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions provide clear, verifiable value propositions. Overall, the website’s content raises numerous red flags commonly associated with scam websites. The use of vague, generic language, bold claims without evidence, and a lack of specific, verifiable details about the company’s operations, team, and regulatory compliance are all concerning. Additionally, the emphasis on control over assets and money, the use of fabricated or cherry-picked user reviews, and the lack of transparency about the company’s qualifications and industry standing are all common tactics used by scam websites to create an illusion of credibility. It is important to approach this website with extreme caution and conduct thorough independent research and verification before engaging with the company or providing any personal or financial information.”
the reasons behind this review :
Generic and vague statements, Repetition of certain phrases, Emphasis on control over assets and money, Lack of specific, verifiable details, Bold and unverified claims, Fabricated or cherry-picked user reviews, Use of the term 'asset management' without clear explanations, Emphasis on 'shared success' and constantly improving professional capabilities, Mention of 'industry qualifications' without independent verification, Use of the term 'your preferred exchange' without evidence, Emphasis on 'compliant trading environment' without specific details about regulatory oversight, Mention of 'constantly improving our professional capabilities and service levels' without evidence, Use of the term 'introduction to Deleno IFC' without providing clear, detailed information, Emphasis on 'reliable secure innovative' without specific details or evidence, Mention of 'top-notch infrastructure' without specific details or evidence, Use of the term 'home' without clear navigation or detailed information, Mention of 'products' without clear, detailed information, Mention of 'security' without specific details about security measures, Mention of 'team service' without specific details about the team, Mention of 'value' without specific details or evidence
Positive Points | Negative Points |
---|---|
website content is accessible No Spell and grammar mistakes in site content Whois data is accessible Domain is between 1M list of tranco | negative reviews are more than Positive reviews Low review rate by AI Domain is new Archive is new |
How much trust do people have in delenofincorp.com?
Domain age :
10 months and 11 days
WHOIS data :
Accessible
Website :
delenofincorp.com
Title :
IFC Business Change on Home Page
Website Rank :
225750
Archive Age :
0 year(s) 8 month(s) 17 day(s)
SSL certificate valid :
Valid
SSL type :
Low - Domain Validated Certificates (DV SSL)
SSL issuer :
Cloudflare, Inc.
WHOIS registration date :
2023/07/06
WHOIS last update date :
2024/05/12
WHOIS renew date :
2024/07/06
Organisation :
Domains By Proxy, LLC
State/Province :
Arizona
Country :
US
Phone :
+1.4806242599
Email :
Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=delenofincorp.com
Organisation :
Domains By Proxy, LLC
State/Province :
Arizona
Country :
US
Phone :
+1.4806242599
Email :
Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=delenofincorp.com
Organisation :
Domains By Proxy, LLC
State/Province :
Arizona
Country :
US
Phone :
+1.4806242599
Email :
Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=delenofincorp.com
IP : 172.67.70.211
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
IP : 104.26.1.224
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
IP : 104.26.0.224
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
Name :
GoDaddy.com, LLC
IANA ID :
146
Register website :
https://www.godaddy.com
Phone :
+1.4806242505
Email :
abuse@godaddy.com
Target : annalise.ns.cloudflare.com
IP : 108.162.194.234
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
Target : finley.ns.cloudflare.com
IP : 172.64.35.58
ISP : AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
Country : US
This website was last scanned on August 23, 2024
ehow.com
eHow is a popular online resource for DIY (Do It Yourself) enthusiasts, offering a wide range of articles and videos on various topics such as home improvement, cooking, crafting, and...
t2.infomails.microsoft.com
https://t2.infomails.microsoft.com redirected to https//auth.services.adobe.com during the time we crawled it. The provided URL, https://t2.infomails.microsoft.com, appears to be a phishing attempt. The URL is not a legitimate Microsoft domain, and the...
academy.institucionaltradinglab.com
The website 'academy.institucionaltradinglab.com' appears to be related to financial education, specifically in the area of trading. However, several aspects raise concerns: 1. **Lack of Verifiable Information**: The website does not...
They closed my trades without even taking time to inform me and went ahead to announce that it was technical problems, but i received no compensation and lost so much, trustpilot stop trying to silent me by deleting my reviews. Flashreclaim at gmail DOT C O M made sure I got back every penny they failed to pay me, all I had to do was file a report to them and they acted really fast and made sure I was refunded in less than two weeks |