cippoint.com Reviews

The website cippoint.com appears to be a financial services platform, offering a wide range of services related to banking, legal, and financial matters in Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman. The services listed include the sale of various types of visas, Mastercards, and company registration in Turkey. They also offer legal and corporate services for export development and revenue generation in these countries. The site claims to provide free consultations and displays contact information for phone and WhatsApp communication. It also includes a warning about counterfeit websites and advises users to ensure they are on the correct page. The site is designed with a copyright notice by “karait.” The content is in Persian (Farsi), and the site appears to target Persian-speaking individuals or businesses interested in financial and legal services in the mentioned countries. The site also includes a blog section and information about various discounts and gifts. The site’s footer contains links to different sections, including “About Us,” “Contact Us,” and “Terms and Conditions.” The site also provides a Tehran address and a contact number. The site’s content and offerings suggest that it is primarily focused on financial and legal services, particularly related to international business and financial transactions. The inclusion of services related to visas, Mastercards, and company registration in multiple countries, along with the emphasis on financial and legal support, indicates a broad scope of operations. The site’s use of a warning about counterfeit websites and the provision of contact information for consultations may be an attempt to build trust with potential clients. However, it’s important to note that the information provided here is based on the content visible on the website. It’s always advisable to conduct thorough research and due diligence, especially when dealing with financial and legal services, and to verify the legitimacy of the company and its offerings through independent sources.”

the reasons behind this review :
High gap ratio (3.59) for older domain, Suspicious domain age and archive age