Why is the trust score of bunny.deb.parrot.sh very low?
https://bunny.deb.parrot.sh redirected to https//deb.parrot.sh during the time we crawled it. The website's URL is https://deb.parrot.sh/direct//. The website's content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. We conducted a Google search, and no information about the site was found in the search results. Additionally, we checked the Google Web Cache, but there was no content available there either. The domain age is unknown, and the domain whois information is hidden. The SSL certificate is issued by Let's Encrypt, and the type is DV (Domain Validated). The website's global rank from Tranco is 0, indicating very low traffic or visibility. The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine shows that the site has been archived for 770 days. The server information indicates that the site is hosted on parrotsec.b-cdn.net with the IP address 169.150.236.105, which is associated with BunnyCDN and located in Chicago, Illinois, US. The AS (Autonomous System) number is 60068, belonging to Datacamp Limited. The coordinates for the location are 41.8500°N, 87.6500°W. The time zone is America/Chicago. Given the limited information available and the intentional inaccessibility of the site's content, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive evaluation. However, several red flags can be identified: 1. Intentional Inaccessibility: The deliberate inaccessibility of the site's content and the absence of information in search results raise concerns about the site's legitimacy and transparency. Legitimate websites typically aim for visibility and accessibility. 2. Hidden Domain Whois Information: The decision to conceal domain whois information can be a red flag, as it hinders transparency and makes it difficult to verify the site's ownership and authenticity. 3. Low Global Rank: A global rank of 0 from Tranco indicates very low traffic or visibility, which can be a sign of a newly established or obscure website. 4. Limited SSL Information: While the use of Let's Encrypt for SSL is common and generally reliable, the absence of extended validation (EV) or organization validation (OV) can be a minor concern. 5. Hosting and Server Details: The use of BunnyCDN for hosting and the specific server and IP information can be further investigated to understand the site's infrastructure and potential associations. 6. Lack of Historical Data: The limited historical data available, including the unknown domain age, can make it challenging to assess the site's track record and credibility. 7. Unusual URL Structure: The URL structure with multiple slashes (//) and the use of subdomains can be atypical and may warrant further scrutiny. It's important to note that these observations are based on the available information and general best practices for evaluating website legitimacy. Without direct access to the site's content or comprehensive domain history, a definitive assessment is difficult. If you have specific concerns about the site or are considering engaging with it, it's advisable to exercise caution, conduct further research, and consider seeking additional expert opinions or verification from trusted sources."
the reasons behind this review :
Intentional Inaccessibility, Hidden Domain Whois Information, Low Global Rank, Limited SSL Information, Hosting and Server Details, Lack of Historical Data, Unusual URL Structure
