← Back to Home

Is ltem-2757.click/cash260834945 Suspicious? 30/100 Trust Score

Website: ltem-2757.click/cash260834945

Screenshot of ltem-2757.click/cash260834945

Safety Score

30/100
High Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: financial services
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is ltem-2757.click/cash260834945 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose ltem-2757.click/cash260834945 was analyzed as a financial services website with online payment characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 50/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 50/100 in financial services (online payment). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 1504 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: Domain age is unknown, indicating potential newness and lack of established trust. | No SPF or DMARC records found, which are essential for email security. | Only one contact method (email) is provided, lacking transparency.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Missing physical address and phone number | Evidence: contact information Finding: Nonsensical homepage content | Evidence: homepage text Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: R13 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates unknown age based on unknown . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the site before engaging in any transactions.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Privacy/terms disclosures are missing or not clearly accessible from captured pages
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: missing, DMARC: missing)
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Missing physical address and phone number | Evidence: contact information
  • [CONTENT] Nonsensical homepage content | Evidence: homepage text
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN] Domain age is unknown, indicating potential newness and lack of established trust.
  • [SECURITY] No SPF or DMARC records found, which are essential for email security.
  • [CONTACT] Only one contact method (email) is provided, lacking transparency.
  • [CONTENT] Homepage content is nonsensical and does not clearly describe services offered.
  • [REPUTATION] The site is not ranked in the top 1 million websites, indicating low traffic and potential lack of trust.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"high_risk_category","reason":"High-risk financial/crypto business model requires manual verification","scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"high_risk_financial_compound","reason":"Unregulated crypto/financial platform with 5 risk signals: young domain (0yr), unranked traffic, no phone, no physical address, no regulatory info","scoreCeiling":30,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"status_score_alignment","reason":"Status \"warning\" requires score = 40 (was 30)","scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"scam"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details