← Back to Home

Is capitalfusionltd.org Suspicious? 35/100 Trust Score

Website: capitalfusionltd.org

Screenshot of capitalfusionltd.org

Safety Score

35/100
High Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Financial Services
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is capitalfusionltd.org Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose capitalfusionltd.org was analyzed as a Financial Services website with Wealth Management characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 60/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 60/100 in Financial Services (Wealth Management). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 2727 characters. Supplementary coverage included 2 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: DOMAIN_AGE 652 days old, indicating a relatively new presence in the market. | SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. | VIRUSTOTAL No malicious reports found, indicating a clean reputation.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: DMARC_MISSING The domain lacks DMARC records, which could expose it to email spoofing risks. Finding: TERMS_MISSING The website does not provide a terms of service page, which is a common transparency issue. Finding: PRIVACY_MISSING There is no privacy policy available, raising concerns about data handling practices. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 1 year(s) based on whois_fast_path . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Verify the legitimacy of services independently before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • DMARC_MISSING The domain lacks DMARC records, which could expose it to email spoofing risks.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • DOMAIN_AGE 652 days old, indicating a relatively new presence in the market.
  • SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • VIRUSTOTAL No malicious reports found, indicating a clean reputation.
  • SPF_RECORD The domain has SPF records set up, which is a positive sign for email security.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Verified contact/legal links and contact details were detected from captured pages.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"high_risk_category","reason":"High-risk financial/crypto business model requires manual verification","scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"high_risk_financial_compound","reason":"Crypto/financial platform with multiple risk signals: young domain (1yr), unranked traffic, no regulatory info","scoreCeiling":35,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"status_score_alignment","reason":"Status \"warning\" requires score = 40 (was 35)","scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"scam"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details