documentforce.com Reviews

https://documentforce.com redirected to https//www.salesforce.com during the time we crawled it. The website’s URL is https://documentforce.com. The website’s content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. We conducted a Google search, and no information about the site was found in the search results. Additionally, we checked the Google Web Cache, but there was no content available there either. Evaluate this website based on the provided parameters, taking into account the global rank from Tranco, domain name, domain age, SSL type, Internet Archive: Wayback Machine age, servers and IPs, and WHOIS information. Domain Age: 21 years and 1 month and 16 days Domain WHOIS: Accessible SSL Info: Organization: DigiCert Inc, Issuer: DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1, Type: DV Tranco: 26972 Internet Archive: Wayback Machine: 7350 days Server Info: documentforce.com / 35.176.92.20 – ec2-35-176-92-20.eu-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com – London, England, GB – 51.5085, -0.1257 – AS16509 Amazon.com, Inc. – E1W – Europe/London Based on the provided information, the website’s domain age is significant, indicating that it has been in existence for a long time. The SSL certificate is issued by a reputable organization, DigiCert Inc. However, the intentional inaccessibility of the website’s content and the lack of information in search results raise concerns. The website’s low visibility and absence of indexed content may indicate that it is not actively maintained or used for legitimate purposes. Additionally, the use of a generic SSL certificate type (DV) does not provide extended validation of the website’s authenticity. The server information shows that the website is hosted on an Amazon Web Services (AWS) server in London, which is a common and reputable hosting provider. However, the specific IP address (35.176.92.20) does not provide additional insights. The lack of content in the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine further supports the notion that the website may not have a substantial online presence or history. Overall, while some aspects of the website, such as its domain age and SSL issuer, appear reputable, the intentional inaccessibility of content and low visibility in search results raise significant concerns about its legitimacy and trustworthiness. It is advisable to exercise caution and further investigate the website before engaging with it, especially for sensitive activities such as providing personal information or making financial transactions.”

the reasons behind this review :
Intentional inaccessibility of website content, Lack of information in search results, Low visibility and absence of indexed content, Use of a generic SSL certificate type (DV), Hosting on a common and reputable provider (Amazon Web Services), Lack of substantial content in the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, Domain age is significant, but may not indicate current activity or legitimacy