Get Verified
Secure Your Website with Our Verification Badge

How much trust do people have in qbnw.com?

0.0

Total 0 reviews

All reviews are from registered members


Reliable
0
Trustworthy
0
Neutral
0
Suspicious
0
Untrustworthy
0
qbnw.com

Why is the trust score of qbnw.com very low?

The website qbnw.com claims to be a modeling agency, QuickBook Modeling, established in 1973, and promotes itself as a legitimate and respected agency for models of all ages. However, several red flags and inconsistencies suggest that this website may not be a trustworthy or legitimate modeling agency. Here are some reasons for concern:

1. Lack of Verifiable Information: The website provides limited verifiable information about its history, operations, and the people behind the agency. Legitimate modeling agencies typically have transparent information about their founders, team, and history.

2. Unrealistic Claims: QuickBook Modeling makes bold claims about its long-standing reputation and the high number of companies that have used its services since 1973. These claims are difficult to verify and may be exaggerated.

3. Vague Client Testimonials: The website includes testimonials from supposed clients, but these testimonials lack specific details and could be fabricated.

4. Generalized Job Descriptions: The website lists a wide range of potential modeling jobs, including fashion print, TV commercials, and magazine editorials. Legitimate agencies typically provide more specific and realistic job descriptions.

5. No Mention of Industry Affiliations: Legitimate modeling agencies often have affiliations with industry organizations or associations, which can help establish their credibility. QuickBook Modeling does not mention any such affiliations.

6. Lack of Transparency in the Application Process: The website encourages aspiring models to apply but does not provide clear information about the application process, evaluation criteria, or the agency's selection standards.

7. Unsubstantiated Claims of Safety and Legitimacy: QuickBook Modeling repeatedly emphasizes its safety, legitimacy, and the professionalism of its staff. However, these claims are not backed up with verifiable evidence or industry recognition.

8. No Information on Industry Regulations: Legitimate modeling agencies typically provide information about industry regulations, such as labor laws, fair pay standards, and the rights of models. QuickBook Modeling does not offer such information.

9. Lack of Transparency in Fees and Commissions: The website does not clearly outline its fee structure, commission rates, or any potential costs for models. Legitimate agencies are transparent about their financial arrangements.

10. Limited Online Presence and Reviews: While the website claims to have a long history, there is limited information and reviews about QuickBook Modeling from independent sources or industry professionals.

11. Use of High-Pressure Sales Tactics: The website's emphasis on the urgency of applying and its dismissal of negative reviews as unreliable could be seen as high-pressure sales tactics.

12. No Information on Talent Representation: Legitimate modeling agencies provide detailed information about the models they represent, including their portfolios and success stories. QuickBook Modeling does not offer this.

It's important for individuals considering a career in modeling to thoroughly research any agency they are considering and to be cautious of websites that exhibit these red flags. Seeking advice from established professionals in the modeling industry can also provide valuable insights and guidance."

the reasons behind this review :
Lack of Verifiable Information, Unrealistic Claims, Vague Client Testimonials, Generalized Job Descriptions, No Mention of Industry Affiliations, Lack of Transparency in the Application Process, Unsubstantiated Claims of Safety and Legitimacy, No Information on Industry Regulations, Lack of Transparency in Fees and Commissions, Limited Online Presence and Reviews, Use of High-Pressure Sales Tactics, No Information on Talent Representation
Positive PointsNegative Points

  Website content is accessible

  No spelling or grammatical errors in site content

  Domain Age is quite old

  Archive Age is quite old

  Low review rate by AI

  Whois data is hidden