yulilyweb.com Reviews

The website yulilyweb.com appears to be a high-risk website based on the following observations:

Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, being only 3 months and 13 days old. While this alone doesn’t indicate a scam, it’s a common characteristic of many fraudulent websites that are created and taken down quickly to avoid detection.

Domain Whois: The whois information for the domain is hidden. While this is not necessarily a red flag on its own, it can be a tactic used by scam websites to avoid being identified.

SSL Certificate: The SSL certificate is issued by DigiCert Inc, which is a legitimate certificate authority. However, the fact that it’s a Domain Validated (DV) certificate means that the certificate authority only verified that the domain is controlled by the applicant. This type of certificate is the easiest to obtain and doesn’t provide the same level of validation as Extended Validation (EV) or Organization Validated (OV) certificates.

Internet Archive: Wayback Machine Age: The website has been archived by the Wayback Machine for 100 days. This is a relatively short period and may indicate that the website is not well-established or has undergone recent changes.

Server Information: The website is hosted on a server with the IP address 104.18.19.204, located in San Francisco, California, and is managed by Cloudflare, Inc. This information is standard for many websites and doesn’t necessarily indicate legitimacy or fraud.

Content Accessibility: The website’s content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. This behavior can be suspicious, as legitimate websites typically want their content to be easily accessible.

Search Engine Results: A Google search yielded no information about the site in the search results. While this alone is not conclusive, it can be a red flag when combined with other factors.

Overall, the combination of a new domain, hidden whois information, a DV SSL certificate, limited internet archive history, and intentional content inaccessibility raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of this website. It’s advisable to exercise caution and conduct further research or avoid engaging with the site altogether.”