footbalcenter.com Reviews

The website ‘footbalcenter.com’ claims to be a specialized center for purchasing sports kits and football equipment. However, several aspects of the website raise red flags:

1. Domain Age and Archive Age: The domain is relatively new, being 3 years and 11 months old. Additionally, the website has been archived by the Wayback Machine 1141 days ago, which is a significant gap. This inconsistency is a red flag for the legitimacy of the website.

2. Domain Whois Information: The domain’s whois information is hidden, which is often a tactic used by fraudulent or suspicious websites to conceal their identity.

3. Server Location: The server is located in Shiraz, Fars, IR. While this doesn’t necessarily indicate a scam, it’s worth noting that some fraudulent websites use servers in locations known for hosting such activities.

4. SSL Certificate: The SSL certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt, which is a legitimate certificate authority. However, the use of a DV (Domain Validated) certificate means that the identity of the website owner has not been verified beyond their control of the domain. This is common for both legitimate and suspicious websites.

5. Content and Claims: The website claims to be a reputable and experienced sports kit seller with over 15 years of experience. However, the domain’s age contradicts this claim. Additionally, the website’s content is generic and lacks specific details about the company’s history, team, or physical address.

6. High Gap Ratio: By analyzing the domain age and archive age, we determined that the domain is suspicious because of a high gap ratio (1.31) for an older domain. This is a red flag.

Based on these findings, it’s advisable to exercise caution when dealing with this website. If you’re considering making a purchase, conduct thorough research, look for independent reviews, and consider using secure payment methods. It’s also a good practice to verify the legitimacy of a website by checking for customer feedback and ensuring that it has a physical address and contact information.”

the reasons behind this review :
High gap ratio (1.31) for older domain, Domain whois information is hidden, Use of a DV (Domain Validated) SSL certificate, Generic and lacking specific details about the company's history, team, or physical address, Inconsistency in domain age and archive age, Server location in Shiraz, Fars, IR