sittingonclouds.net Reviews

The website content provided seems to be a placeholder or a generic message, which is often a red flag for potential scams. Legitimate websites typically have more detailed and specific content, especially on their homepage. The copyright date range (2017 – 2024) is unusually long and could be a tactic to make the site appear more established or legitimate. However, it’s worth noting that the current year is 2022, so claiming a copyright up to 2024 seems speculative. The use of a Ray ID, especially when repeated, is not typical for a standard website. It’s more commonly associated with security and performance services like Cloudflare. This could be an attempt to appear more secure or to obfuscate the actual server details. The privacy policy link provided (lyratris.com/privacy) does not necessarily guarantee the legitimacy of the site. Scammers can easily create fake privacy policies or link to unrelated legitimate sites to appear more trustworthy. It’s essential to verify the actual content and legitimacy of the privacy policy. The SSL certificate information provided (organization: Google Trust Services, issuer: WR1, type: DV) seems inconsistent and potentially misleading. Google Trust Services is a legitimate certificate authority, but the issuer “WR1” is not a standard or recognized entity in the SSL certificate ecosystem. Additionally, the “type: DV” (Domain Validated) is a basic level of SSL certificate and does not provide extensive verification of the website owner’s identity. It’s important to note that scammers can obtain DV SSL certificates, so the presence of SSL alone does not guarantee the legitimacy of a website. The server information (sittingonclouds.net / 45.86.153.0-cdn.lyratris.net-1-Holborn-England-GB-51.5175,-0.1205-AS200950 Lyratris Limited-EC1-Europe/London) is detailed but should be verified for accuracy. Scammers can manipulate server information to appear more legitimate. It’s also worth noting that the use of a content delivery network (CDN) like cdn.lyratris.net is common for legitimate websites, but scammers can also use CDNs to mask their actual server locations. The domain age (6 years and 4 months and 17 days) is relatively long, which could be seen as a positive indicator. However, scammers can also use old domains to appear more trustworthy. It’s important to consider other factors in conjunction with domain age. The Tranco rank (469837) is relatively low, indicating that the website is not highly ranked in terms of web traffic. While this is not necessarily a sign of a scam, it’s worth considering in the overall assessment of the website. The Internet Archive Wayback Machine data (2321 days) indicates that the website has been archived for several years. This can be useful for verifying the historical content and changes to the site over time. However, scammers can also create long-standing websites, so the archive age alone does not guarantee legitimacy. Overall, based on the provided content and the analysis, the website raises several red flags that are commonly associated with potential scams. It’s important to exercise caution and conduct further research, especially if considering any interactions or transactions with the site.”

the reasons behind this review :
Placeholder or Generic Content, Unusually Long Copyright Date Range, Use of Ray ID, Privacy Policy Link, Inconsistent SSL Certificate Information, Basic Level of SSL Certificate (DV), Detailed but Potentially Manipulated Server Information, Use of Content Delivery Network (CDN), Relatively Long Domain Age, Low Tranco Rank, Internet Archive Wayback Machine Data