plotlyjob.com Reviews

The website content is vague and lacks specific information about the company, its services, or its team. The language used is not professional and contains grammatical errors, which is unusual for a legitimate business website. The login form on the homepage is a red flag, as it’s not typical for a professional website to have a login form prominently displayed without proper context or explanation. Legitimate businesses usually provide clear information about their services, contact details, and a professional-looking website. The lack of these elements raises concerns about the legitimacy of this website. The domain age of 22 days is also very new, which is often a characteristic of suspicious or potentially unreliable websites. Legitimate businesses typically have a longer online presence. The domain whois information being hidden is another red flag. While some legitimate businesses choose to keep their domain registration details private, it’s more common for scam websites to do so. The use of Let’s Encrypt for SSL is not inherently suspicious, as Let’s Encrypt is a legitimate certificate authority. However, scammers can also use SSL certificates, so it’s not a definitive indicator of legitimacy. The server information provided is not enough to make a determination about the website’s legitimacy. It’s important to note that scammers can use hosting services in various locations, so the physical location of the server doesn’t necessarily indicate the trustworthiness of the website. The lack of presence in the Tranco ranking and the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine is not necessarily a red flag on its own, as these are just additional data points. However, when combined with the other concerning factors, it adds to the overall suspicion. In summary, based on the information provided, the website raises several red flags that are commonly associated with scam or untrustworthy websites. It’s advisable to exercise caution and conduct further research or verification before engaging with this website or providing any personal information.”

the reasons behind this review :
Vague and unprofessional website content, Lack of specific information about the company and its services, Prominent login form without proper context or explanation, New domain age (22 days), Domain whois information is hidden, Use of Let's Encrypt for SSL is not a definitive indicator of legitimacy, Server information alone is not enough to determine legitimacy, Lack of presence in Tranco ranking and Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, Overall combination of red flags commonly associated with scam or untrustworthy websites