cis.org Reviews

The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is a non-profit, non-partisan research organization that advocates for more restrictive immigration policies. It was founded in 1985 by Dr. John Tanton, a retired Michigan ophthalmologist, and has been influential in shaping the immigration debate in the United States. CIS describes itself as being pro-immigrant, but in favor of lower immigration levels and more stringent enforcement of immigration laws. The organization conducts research and analysis on a wide range of immigration-related topics, including the economic and social impacts of immigration, border security, and immigration policy reform. It publishes reports, briefs, and articles on its findings, and its scholars are often quoted in media coverage of immigration issues. CIS has been both praised and criticized for its work. Supporters view it as providing valuable data and analysis that informs immigration policy discussions, while critics argue that it promotes anti-immigrant sentiment and uses flawed methodologies in its research. The organization has also been accused of having ties to white nationalist and anti-immigrant groups, which it has denied. It’s important to approach information from CIS with a critical mindset and to consider a range of perspectives on immigration issues. As with any organization, it’s essential to evaluate the credibility of its research and the potential biases that may influence its findings. Additionally, seeking out diverse sources of information and expert opinions can provide a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues like immigration.”

the reasons behind this review :
Non-profit, Non-partisan, Research organization, Advocates for more restrictive immigration policies, Founded in 1985 by Dr. John Tanton, Conducts research and analysis on immigration-related topics, Publishes reports, briefs, and articles, Scholars quoted in media coverage, Both praised and criticized for its work, Accused of ties to white nationalist and anti-immigrant groups, Denies ties to such groups, Approach information critically, Consider a range of perspectives, Evaluate credibility of research, Seek diverse sources of information and expert opinions