quivermarkets.com Reviews

The website quivermarkets.com appears to be a high-risk site based on the following observations:

Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, being only 3 months and 22 days old. New domains are often associated with higher risk, as they have not yet established a reputation.

Domain Whois: The whois information for the domain is hidden. While this is not necessarily indicative of a scam, it can be a red flag, as legitimate businesses typically provide transparent contact information.

SSL Certificate: The site uses a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate, which is a positive sign for security. However, it’s important to note that having an SSL certificate does not guarantee the legitimacy of a website.

Global Rank: The site has a very low global rank according to Tranco, which is a tool for ranking websites based on their traffic and page views. This suggests that the site is not well-established or widely visited.

Internet Archive: Wayback Machine Age: The site has been archived by the Wayback Machine for 37 days. This means that there is limited historical data available for the site, which can make it difficult to assess its trustworthiness.

Server Information: The site is hosted on a server with the IP address 54.38.50.173, which is associated with OVH SAS. The location of the server is in Warsaw, Mazovia, Poland. While the server location itself is not a cause for concern, it’s worth noting for reference.

Content Accessibility: The website’s content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. This lack of transparency can be a red flag.

Search Engine Results: A Google search did not yield any information about the site in the search results. This lack of online presence can be concerning, as legitimate businesses typically have some online visibility.

Based on these observations, it’s important to approach the website with caution. The combination of a new domain, hidden whois information, low global rank, limited historical data, and intentional content inaccessibility raises several red flags. It’s advisable to conduct further research and consider these factors when deciding whether to engage with the site.”