whookroo.com Reviews

The website https://whookroo.com appears to be suspicious based on the provided information. Here are the reasons:

Inaccessible Content: The intentional inaccessibility of the website’s content is a significant red flag. It suggests that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index, which is unusual for a legitimate website.

Lack of Information in Search Results: The absence of any information about the site in Google search results is concerning. Legitimate websites typically have some online presence and can be found through search engines.

No Content in Google Web Cache: The fact that there was no content available in the Google web cache further supports the suspicion that the website may not have legitimate or indexable content.

Domain Age: The domain age of 2 years and 1 month is relatively young. While this alone is not a definitive indicator of suspicious activity, it is worth considering in conjunction with other factors.

SSL Certificate: The use of a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate is common for many websites, including legitimate ones. However, it does not guarantee the overall legitimacy of the site.

Tranco Global Rank: The Tranco global rank of 554,261 is relatively low, indicating that the website is not widely recognized or visited. This could be due to various reasons, including lack of legitimacy or popularity.

Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) Age: The fact that the website has been inaccessible for 649 days in the Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) is highly unusual. Legitimate websites typically have a consistent presence in web archives.

Server Information: The server information provided (139.45.197.119, Lelystad, Flevoland, NL, AS9002 RETN Limited) does not inherently indicate legitimacy or suspiciousness. However, it is worth noting for a comprehensive assessment.

Domain Whois: The accessibility of the domain whois information is a standard feature and does not provide direct evidence of legitimacy or suspiciousness.

Overall, the combination of intentionally inaccessible content, lack of online presence, and unusual behavior in web archives raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of the website. It is advisable to exercise extreme caution and consider alternative, more established sources for any information or services the website may claim to offer.”