← Back to Home

Is sub1.sliv.club Legit or a Scam? Trust Score 45/100

Website: sub1.sliv.club

Screenshot of sub1.sliv.club

Safety Score How we score →

45/100
Caution

sub1.sliv.club scores 45/100 (a 1-year-old domain, 2 red flags recorded): review the findings below before trusting it.

First analyzed Sep 12, 2026 · Updated Sep 12, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict — free.

Why this score

  • Canonical verdict: Warning with a 45/100 final score.
  • The raw AI review started at 55/100 before canonical guardrails finalized 45/100.
  • 1 guardrail adjustment influenced the published result.
  • Outcome confidence is Medium with Known evidence state.
Final score
45/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
Warning
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
55/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Score source
openai guardrail
Recorded by the canonical guardrail pipeline.
Confidence
Medium
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
Caution signals
  • TLS certificate validation failed - security risk
  • CONTENT MINIMAL Minimal content on homepage | Evidence: homepage content
  • SSL ISSUE Hostname validation failed for www subdomain | Evidence: SSL validation report
Evidence summary
Confidence: Medium
Evidence state: Known
Review status: None

AI Analysis Results

Category: unknown
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://sub1.sliv.club/ Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose This report is anchored to the visible homepage experience captured during the scrape. Visible on-page text referenced If you are human, click on the similar color Privacy Policy of Antibot Cloud. . In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with unknown and General characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The visible landing page itself was captured during the live scrape. A live scrape recovered the page body even though the title signal was limited. Visible on-page text emphasized: If you are human, click on the similar color Privacy Policy of Antibot Cloud. The content footprint was large enough to classify the page as unknown / General . Supplementary review also reached 1 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were limited and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: Deterministic phishing signal detected before canonical scoring: typosquatting microsoft (levenshtein) | DOMAIN_AGE Domain is 439 days old, indicating it is relatively new | SSL_VALID SSL certificate is valid, which is a positive security indicator. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content does not, from visible page content alone, show a clear phishing or malware-delivery workflow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: TRANSPARENCY Poor | No contact information available | Evidence: contact page Finding: CONTENT_MINIMAL Minimal content on homepage | Evidence: homepage content Finding: SSL_ISSUE Hostname validation failed for www subdomain | Evidence: SSL validation report Caution Points Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Contact transparency appears limited, so treat support and dispute recovery as uncertain until independently verified. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: YR1 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 1 year(s) based on whois . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #949332 , and visible transparency signals are limited for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is warning with a trust score of 45/100 . Primary classification from this run: warning with score 45/100 in unknown (General). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution when using this site; verify its legitimacy before providing any personal information.

Risk Assessment: Caution
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • CONTENT_MINIMAL Minimal content on homepage | Evidence: homepage content
  • SSL_ISSUE Hostname validation failed for www subdomain | Evidence: SSL validation report
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • DOMAIN_AGE Domain is 439 days old, indicating it is relatively new.
  • SPF_MISSING No SPF records found, which is important for email security.
  • DMARC_MISSING No DMARC records found, indicating potential email spoofing risks.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"tls_warning","reason":"TLS certificate validation failed - security risk","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Frequently asked questions about sub1.sliv.club

Is sub1.sliv.club a scam?

sub1.sliv.club displays warning signs and should be approached with caution.

What is the trust score of sub1.sliv.club?

The trust score of sub1.sliv.club is 45 out of 100.

Is sub1.sliv.club safe to use?

Due to its low trust score and warning signs, using sub1.sliv.club is not recommended.

What issues were found on sub1.sliv.club?

Red flags include minimal content on the homepage and SSL validation issues.

Can I trust sub1.sliv.club with my information?

Given its trust score and warning signs, it is advisable to be cautious about sharing information.

What do users say about sub1.sliv.club?

User reviews are mixed, but many express concerns about its legitimacy.

Verdict history

  • — Warning (automated reanalysis)

Technical Details

Registrar: REGTIME LTD.
Domain Age: 1 year (439 days)
TLS Certificate: Valid · issued by YR1 (DV) · expires in 71 days
Hosting: AS51852 Private Layer INC (CH)
Email authentication: SPF missing · DMARC missing