← Back to Home

stake-x.net Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Website: stake-x.net

Screenshot of stake-x.net

Safety Score

10/100
✗ Scam Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Crypto
About this website:

The website stake-x.net appears to be a high-risk site based on the following observations: Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, being only 1 month and 28 days old. While this alone doesn't indicate a scam, it's a common tactic for fraudulent websites to use new domains to avoid a bad reputation. Domain Whois: The whois information is hidden, which is often a red flag. Legitimate websites typically have transparent whois information. SSL Info: The SSL certificate is issued by Google Trust Services, which is a legitimate certificate authority. However, the fact that it's a Domain Validated (DV) certificate means that the certificate authority only verified that the domain is controlled by the applicant. This is the lowest level of validation and doesn't provide assurance about the legitimacy of the organization behind the website. Internet Archive: Wayback Machine Age: The website's content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. Additionally, the site has a short history on the Wayback Machine, with only 21 days of archive age. This lack of historical data can be a warning sign. Server Info: The website is hosted on Cloudflare, which is a legitimate content delivery network and security provider. However, the use of Cloudflare alone doesn't guarantee the legitimacy of the site. Overall, the combination of a new domain, hidden whois information, and limited historical data raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of stake-x.net. It's important to exercise caution and thoroughly research any website before engaging with it, especially if it involves financial transactions or personal information."

Risk Assessment: scam
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • New domain, Hidden whois information, Low SSL certificate validation, Limited historical data on the Wayback Machine, Use of a popular but not inherently trustworthy hosting service