← Back to Home

Is sosogsm.net Risky? 55/100 Trust Score

Website: sosogsm.net

Screenshot of sosogsm.net

Safety Score

55/100
Risky

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: E-commerce
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is sosogsm.net Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose sosogsm.net was analyzed as a E-commerce website with Mobile Services characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in E-commerce (Mobile Services). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 378 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are limited , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: The domain is 9 years old, indicating some level of stability. | The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. | VirusTotal and Google WebRisk show the site as clean with no malicious flags.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Missing contact information | No address, phone, or email found | Evidence: contact transparency analysis Finding: No privacy policy or terms of service | Lack of legal documentation | Evidence: site content Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Contact transparency appears limited; avoid high-risk actions until accountable support channels are confirmed. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: WE1 ), VirusTotal reports 0/95 detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 9 year(s) based on whois_fast_path . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #5212034 , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of services before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: missing, DMARC: missing)
  • [CONTACT] Missing contact information | No address, phone, or email found | Evidence: contact transparency analysis
  • [POLICY] No privacy policy or terms of service | Lack of legal documentation | Evidence: site content
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN] The domain is 9 years old, indicating some level of stability.
  • [SECURITY] The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • [REPUTATION] VirusTotal and Google WebRisk show the site as clean with no malicious flags.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] There is no contact information available, which raises concerns about accountability.
  • [CONTACT] No privacy policy or terms of service found, indicating a lack of transparency.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details