Is slon-2026.cc Suspicious? 30/100 Trust Score

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

Detailed Analysis Report: Is slon-2026.cc Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose slon-2026.cc was analyzed as a Cryptocurrency website with General characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 45/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 45/100 in Cryptocurrency (General). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 26 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are limited , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: Elevated risk signal detected before canonical scoring: new domain (2 days) with 1 VirusTotal detection(s). | Deterministic phishing signal detected before canonical scoring: impersonating kraken. | Threat Intel Hit indicates potential malicious activity.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Threat Intel Hit indicates potential malicious activity. Finding: Newly registered domain (2 days old) raises suspicion. Finding: SSL is valid, but does not guarantee legitimacy. Finding: Flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 vendors. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Contact transparency appears limited; avoid high-risk actions until accountable support channels are confirmed. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: E7 ), VirusTotal reports 1/95 detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 2 day(s) based on rdap . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show 1 malicious engine detection(s), and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Avoid entering personal information; verify legitimacy through official channels.

• [THREAT INTEL] Threat Intel Hit indicates potential malicious activity.
• [DOMAIN AGE] Newly registered domain (2 days old) raises suspicion.
• [SSL VALIDITY] SSL is valid, but does not guarantee legitimacy.
• [VIRUS TOTAL] Flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 vendors.
• [CONTACT TRANSPARENCY] No contact information or legal pages found.

• [THREAT INTEL] Threat Intel Hit indicates potential malicious activity.
• [DOMAIN AGE] Newly registered domain (2 days old) raises suspicion.
• [SSL VALIDITY] SSL is valid, but does not guarantee legitimacy.
• [VIRUS TOTAL] Flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 vendors.
• [CONTACT TRANSPARENCY] No contact information or legal pages found.

• {"type":"security","reason":"New domain (2 days) with 1/95 VirusTotal detections","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":30,"targetStatus":"warning"}
• {"type":"status_score_alignment","reason":"Status \"warning\" requires score = 40 (was 30)","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"scam"}
• {"type":"evidence_sufficiency_limited","reason":"Deterministic evidence sufficiency is limited and should temper the explanation (42% coverage)","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"scam"}