← Back to Home

Is sangyo-keizai.com Risky? 55/100 Trust Score

Website: sangyo-keizai.com

Screenshot of sangyo-keizai.com

Safety Score

55/100
Risky

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Business Services
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is sangyo-keizai.com Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose sangyo-keizai.com was analyzed as a Business Services website with Market Research characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in Business Services (Market Research). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 1086 characters. Supplementary coverage included 2 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: The domain is over 19 years old, indicating a long-standing presence. | The website has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. | No malicious activity detected on VirusTotal, indicating a clean reputation.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Limited contact information available; only an email is provided without a physical address or phone number. Finding: No privacy policy or terms of service found, which raises concerns about user data handling. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: R12 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 19 year(s) based on whois_fast_path . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Verify the legitimacy of services independently before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [REPUTATION] No measurable Tranco ranking despite non-new domain age, limiting independent trust signals
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: configured, DMARC: missing)
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Limited contact information available; only an email is provided without a physical address or phone number.
  • [POLICY] No privacy policy or terms of service found, which raises concerns about user data handling.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is over 19 years old, indicating a long-standing presence.
  • [SECURITY] The website has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • [VIRUSTOTAL] No malicious activity detected on VirusTotal, indicating a clean reputation.
  • [CONTACT INFORMATION] Contact information is limited to an email address, with no physical address provided.
  • [ARCHIVE HISTORY] The website has a suspicious archive gap, which may indicate inconsistencies in its history.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details