← Back to Home

Is roobeat.vercel.app Legit or a Scam? Trust Score 45/100

Website: roobeat.vercel.app

Screenshot of roobeat.vercel.app

Safety Score How we score →

45/100
Caution

roobeat.vercel.app scores 45/100 (categorized as Web Application, 2 red flags recorded): review the findings below before trusting it.

First analyzed Sep 14, 2026 · Updated Sep 14, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict — free.

Why this score

  • Canonical verdict: Warning with a 45/100 final score.
  • The raw AI review started at 55/100 before canonical guardrails finalized 45/100.
  • 1 guardrail adjustment influenced the published result.
  • Outcome confidence is Medium with Known evidence state.
Final score
45/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
Warning
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
55/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Score source
openai guardrail
Recorded by the canonical guardrail pipeline.
Confidence
Medium
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
Caution signals
  • TLS certificate validation failed - security risk
  • [CONTACT] No email, phone, or physical address found on the contact page.
  • [SCRIPT] High severity suspicious script detected that may indicate credential exfiltration.
Evidence summary
Confidence: Medium
Evidence state: Known
Review status: None

AI Analysis Results

Category: Web Application
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://roobeat.vercel.app/ Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose This report is anchored to the visible homepage experience captured during the scrape. The scraped title was روبیت | صفحه اصلی . Visible on-page text referenced روبیت | صفحه اصلی ر روبیت صدای واقعی موسیقی صفحه اصلی موزیک درباره ما تماس با ما شرایط و قوانین ورود به حساب کاربری تم وبسایت سیستم Toggle Sidebar صفحه اصلی روبیت آهنگ‌های پرطرفدار مشاهده همه خوب بهرام نورایی ساز بهرام ن. . In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with Web Application and General characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The visible landing page itself was captured during the live scrape. The scraped title was روبیت | صفحه اصلی , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. Visible on-page text emphasized: روبیت | صفحه اصلی ر روبیت صدای واقعی موسیقی صفحه اصلی موزیک درباره ما تماس با ما شرایط و قوانین ورود به حساب کاربری تم وبسایت سیستم Toggle Sidebar صفحه اصلی روبیت آهنگ‌های پرطرفدار مشاهده همه خوب بهرام نورایی ساز بهرام ن. The content footprint was large enough to classify the page as Web Application / General . Supplementary review also reached 2 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: Deterministic phishing signal detected before canonical scoring: typosquatting vertex exchange (levenshtein) | SSL certificate is valid, ensuring encrypted connections | Contact information is not provided, which is a red flag for user trust. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content does not, from visible page content alone, show a clear phishing or malware-delivery workflow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: Garbled text in title and meta description raises concerns about site purpose. Finding: No email, phone, or physical address found on the contact page. Finding: High severity suspicious script detected that may indicate credential exfiltration. Caution Points Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: WR1 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates unknown age based on unknown . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is warning with a trust score of 45/100 . Primary classification from this run: warning with score 45/100 in Web Application (General). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution when interacting with this site. Verify its legitimacy before providing any personal information.

Risk Assessment: Caution
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [CONTACT] No email, phone, or physical address found on the contact page.
  • [SCRIPT] High severity suspicious script detected that may indicate credential exfiltration.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [SCRIPT] A suspicious script was detected that may pose a risk to user credentials.
  • [DOMAIN] Domain age is unknown, raising concerns about the site's legitimacy.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"tls_warning","reason":"TLS certificate validation failed - security risk","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Frequently asked questions about roobeat.vercel.app

Is roobeat.vercel.app a scam?

There are warning signs about roobeat.vercel.app, including a trust score of 45/100.

Is roobeat.vercel.app safe to use?

Use caution with roobeat.vercel.app as it shows several red flags.

What is the purpose of roobeat.vercel.app?

roobeat.vercel.app appears to be a website with unclear legitimacy, based on our review.

Why does roobeat.vercel.app have a low trust score?

The low trust score of 45/100 is due to the absence of contact information and suspicious scripts detected.

How can I report issues with roobeat.vercel.app?

If you encounter issues with roobeat.vercel.app, document your experience and report it to relevant authorities.

Are there any contact details on roobeat.vercel.app?

No email, phone, or physical address is found on the contact page of roobeat.vercel.app.

Verdict history

  • — Warning (automated reanalysis)

Technical Details

TLS Certificate: Valid · issued by WR1 (DV) · expires in 75 days
Hosting: AS16509 Amazon.com, Inc. (US)
Email authentication: SPF missing · DMARC missing