← Back to Home

Is radmining.co.za Suspicious? 20/100 Trust Score

Website: radmining.co.za

Screenshot of radmining.co.za

Safety Score

20/100
High Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Mining and Commodities
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is radmining.co.za Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose radmining.co.za was analyzed as a Mining and Commodities website with Commodity Trading characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in Mining and Commodities (Commodity Trading). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 9169 characters. Supplementary coverage included 1 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: The domain is only 207 days old, indicating it is relatively new and may lack established credibility. | Contact information is limited; only an email address is provided without a physical address or phone number. | There is no privacy policy or terms of service available on the website, which raises concerns about user data handling.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: Limited contact information available; only an email is provided without a phone number or physical address. Finding: Missing privacy policy and terms of service, which are essential for user trust and legal compliance. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: R13 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is configured . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 207 day(s) based on ct_logs . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the services offered before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [TRUST] Domain is relatively new (207 days), which increases uncertainty for high-trust interactions
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is only 207 days old, indicating it is relatively new and may lack established credibility.
  • [SECURITY] The website has a valid SSL certificate, but the lack of a strong online reputation diminishes trust.
  • [REPUTATION] The website is not ranked in the top 1 million sites globally, indicating low visibility and potential trust issues.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact/legal signals were confirmed from supplementary internal pages.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"high_risk_category","reason":"High-risk financial/crypto business model requires manual verification","scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"high_risk_financial_compound","reason":"Unregulated crypto/financial platform with 5 risk signals: young domain (0yr), unranked traffic, no phone, no physical address, no regulatory info","scoreCeiling":30,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"mining_high_risk_compound","reason":"Mining context with high-risk compound profile: young domain (0yr), unranked traffic, no address/phone, no regulatory info","scoreCeiling":20,"targetStatus":"scam"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details