← Back to Home

prospex.pro Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Website: prospex.pro

Screenshot of prospex.pro

Safety Score

10/100
✗ Scam Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Other
About this website:

The website prospex.pro appears to be a newly registered domain, which can be a red flag for potential scams. The domain age of 18 days is very short, and it's common for fraudulent websites to use new domains to avoid being flagged. Additionally, the fact that the domain whois information is hidden is another potential warning sign. Legitimate websites typically provide transparent and verifiable contact information in their whois records. The use of Cloudflare for SSL is not inherently suspicious, as Cloudflare is a legitimate service, but it's worth noting that scammers can also use SSL certificates to appear more trustworthy. The lack of content in the internet archive and the intentional inaccessibility of the website to search engines are also concerning. Legitimate websites usually want to be indexed by search engines to increase their visibility. The absence of any information about the site in search results is unusual and could indicate that the site is not legitimate. The server location in San Francisco, California, and the use of Cloudflare's services are not inherently suspicious, as they are common for many websites. However, scammers can also use these services, so it's important to consider these factors in the broader context of the website's other characteristics. Overall, the combination of a very new domain, hidden whois information, intentional inaccessibility to search engines, and the lack of content in the internet archive raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of this website. It's important to exercise caution and thoroughly research any unfamiliar website, especially if it involves financial transactions or the sharing of personal information."

Risk Assessment: scam
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • Newly registered domain, Hidden whois information, Intentional inaccessibility to search engines, Lack of content in the internet archive, Lack of information in search results, Server location and SSL provider not inherently suspicious, but should be considered in the broader context.