← Back to Home

Is nfeeds.com a Scam? 10/100 Trust Score

Website: nfeeds.com

Screenshot of nfeeds.com

Safety Score

10/100
High Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: e-commerce
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is nfeeds.com Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose nfeeds.com was analyzed as a e-commerce website with online shopping characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is phishing with a trust score of 10/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: phishing with score 10/100 in e-commerce (online shopping). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 27009 characters. Supplementary coverage included 1 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are present . Additional analysis signals included: The domain is only 980 days old, which is relatively young and can indicate a lack of established trust. | The site has been flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors, raising concerns about its safety. | The site lacks a physical address and phone number, which diminishes trustworthiness.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors flagged the site as malicious. Finding: No physical address or phone number provided, only email contacts. Finding: The domain is less than 3 years old, which can indicate a lack of established credibility. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Read the available policy/terms pages carefully for refund, dispute, and liability terms. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: WR3 ), VirusTotal reports 1/95 detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 2 year(s) based on rdap . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show 1 malicious engine detection(s), and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Risk indicators are substantial enough to treat this domain as potentially unsafe until proven otherwise. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the site before making any purchases.

Risk Assessment: phishing
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [SECURITY] VirusTotal reports 1 malicious engine detection(s)
  • [REPUTATION] No measurable Tranco ranking despite non-new domain age, limiting independent trust signals
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: missing, DMARC: missing)
  • [MALICIOUS FLAG] 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors flagged the site as malicious.
  • [YOUNG DOMAIN] The domain is less than 3 years old, which can indicate a lack of established credibility.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is only 980 days old, which is relatively young and can indicate a lack of established trust.
  • [SECURITY] The site has been flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors, raising concerns about its safety.
  • [SPF/DMARC] The absence of SPF and DMARC records suggests potential vulnerabilities in email security.
  • [ARCHIVE HISTORY] The site's archive history is suspicious, indicating possible attempts to obscure its true nature.
  • [PLATFORM] Hosted login portal by Translate USD USD() NZD(NZ) DKK(DKK) CHF(CHF) CAD(CA) AUD(AU) EUR() GBP() Log with on-page privacy/support links detected.
🛡️ Safety Actions Applied:
  • {"type":"phishing_without_deterministic_evidence","reason":"Phishing label lacked deterministic credential-harvesting or threat-intel evidence; downgraded to manual-review severity","scoreCeiling":10,"targetStatus":"warning"}
  • {"type":"status_score_alignment","reason":"Status \"warning\" requires score = 40 (was 10)","scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"scam"}
Score Source: openai_guardrail
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details