← Back to Home

kyo.finance Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Website: kyo.finance

Screenshot of kyo.finance

Safety Score

10/100
✗ Scam Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Crypto
About this website:

The website kyo.finance claims to be a platform for bringing liquidity to all IPs through a configurable pool system. It also mentions that it accepts not only ERC-20 tokens but all types of on-chain assets, including ERC-721 and 1155. The site also claims to have an easy user experience and powerful features, and it is associated with the Soneium ecosystem. It mentions being a winner of the Spark Incubation and emphasizes that it's the only DEX for permissionless pools, swapping, earning, and growing. It also claims to have a bribe-reward layer to grow together with ecosystem projects, and it states that only 1 transaction is needed for DeFi, which has been simplified. It also promises token incentives for providing liquidity and an intuitive analytics page. The website provides a "Launch App" button for users to access the platform. Based on the information provided, there are several red flags that suggest this website may not be trustworthy: 1. Lack of Detailed Information: The website lacks detailed information about its team, company, or the technology behind its platform. This is a common characteristic of many fraudulent or suspicious websites. 2. Unrealistic Claims: The website makes several bold and unrealistic claims, such as being the only DEX for certain features, simplifying DeFi with just one transaction, and offering token incentives for liquidity provision. These claims are often used by scam projects to attract users. 3. Vague Language: The language used on the website is vague and lacks specific details about how the platform operates, its security measures, or its regulatory compliance. Legitimate financial platforms typically provide clear and detailed information. 4. Association with Soneium Ecosystem: The website mentions being associated with the Soneium ecosystem, but it's unclear what this means or how it adds credibility to the platform. Without further information, this association could be misleading. 5. Lack of Independent Verification: There is no mention of independent audits, security assessments, or partnerships with reputable organizations. Legitimate platforms often seek independent verification to build trust. 6. High-Risk Features: The website's emphasis on high-risk features like permissionless pools, token incentives, and simplified DeFi with just one transaction is concerning. These features are often associated with high-risk or speculative projects. 7. Limited History: The website's domain age of 6 months and 23 days is relatively short. While this alone is not a definitive sign of a scam, it's important to consider in the overall evaluation of the platform's credibility. 8. Hidden Domain Whois Information: The fact that the domain's whois information is hidden can be a red flag. Legitimate businesses typically provide transparent contact information. 9. SSL Certificate: While the website has an SSL certificate, which is a positive security feature, it's important to note that having an SSL certificate does not guarantee the legitimacy of a website. 10. Lack of Independent Reviews: It's important to search for independent reviews or feedback from other users about the platform. If there are no or very few independent reviews, it could be a sign that the platform is not widely recognized or used. Based on these red flags, it's advisable to exercise extreme caution when considering any involvement with this platform. It's recommended to conduct thorough research, seek independent verification, and consult with financial or cryptocurrency experts before engaging with any platform that exhibits these characteristics."

Risk Assessment: scam
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • Lack of Detailed Information, Unrealistic Claims, Vague Language, Association with Soneium Ecosystem, Lack of Independent Verification, High-Risk Features, Limited History, Hidden Domain Whois Information, SSL Certificate, Lack of Independent Reviews