← Back to Home

hdfxs.com Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Website: hdfxs.com

Screenshot of hdfxs.com

Safety Score

10/100
✗ Scam Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Other
About this website:

The website hdfxs.com appears to be a high-risk site based on the following observations: Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, being only 9 months and 12 days old. While this alone doesn't indicate a scam, it's a factor to consider in the overall assessment. Domain Whois: The whois information is hidden, which is often a red flag. Legitimate websites typically have transparent whois information, including the name and contact details of the domain owner. SSL Information: The SSL certificate details are not provided, which is unusual for a legitimate website. SSL certificates are essential for securing online transactions and protecting user data. Tranco Global Rank: The website has a Tranco global rank of 0, which means it's not ranked among the top websites. This could be due to its newness or lack of significant traffic. Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) Age: The site has no recorded history on the Wayback Machine, which is unusual for a legitimate website. Established sites typically have a history of snapshots on the archive. Server Information: The website is hosted on a server with the IP address 160.121.144.254, located in Hong Kong. While the location itself is not a concern, it's worth noting for potential geographical context. Overall, the combination of a new domain, hidden whois information, lack of SSL details, low global rank, and absence from the Wayback Machine raises significant red flags. It's advisable to exercise extreme caution when interacting with this website, especially for any sensitive transactions or personal information sharing. It's recommended to verify the legitimacy of the site through other trusted sources before engaging with it further."

Risk Assessment: scam
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • New domain, Hidden whois information, Lack of SSL details, Low global rank, Absence from the Wayback Machine