Is xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm Legit or a Scam?

xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm scores 40/100 (categorized as E-commerce, 5 red flags recorded): review the findings below before trusting it.

First analyzed Sep 6, 2026

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/ Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The requested page path /v1/index/index.htm was unavailable, so this report is anchored to the base site experience instead of the missing URL. The scraped title was 하우스인포 . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Online real estate services. Visible on-page text referenced 하우스인포 ::: -- 사이트이용안내 결제하기 선택 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 타경 검색 법원경매 테마경매 마이하우스 경매상담실 컨설팅의뢰 경매자료실 커뮤니티 고객센터 종합검색 일정별검색 법원별검색 지역별검색 입찰결과 낙찰. . The content appears aimed at Individuals seeking real estate information. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with E-commerce and Real Estate characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The originally requested path /v1/index/index.htm returned a not-found response, so the analysis fell back to the base site xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr instead of reviewing the missing page. The scraped title was 하우스인포 , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Online real estate services. The page appears aimed at Individuals seeking real estate information. No additional internal page content was needed for a baseline view of the visible experience. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were limited . Additional observed context from the analysis included: The SSL certificate is invalid, posing a security risk | Limited contact information available; only an email is provided | The domain age is unknown, which raises concerns about its legitimacy. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content appears commercially transactional and is trying to move the visitor toward a purchase or service-order flow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: Invalid SSL certificate detected. Finding: Only an email address is provided without a physical address or phone number. Finding: Domain age is unknown, which may indicate a new or untrustworthy site. Finding: Absence of privacy policy and terms of service raises transparency concerns. Caution Points Treat the page as a commercial offer: verify pricing, refund rules, payment handling, and dispute options before paying. Policy pages were not clearly accessible in this scan; request written terms before any payment or account-linked action. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is not fully validated (issuer: not disclosed ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is unknown , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates unknown age based on unknown . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is unknown . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and limited for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is warning with a trust score of 40/100 . Primary classification from this run: warning with score 40/100 in E-commerce (Real Estate). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the services offered before engaging with the site.

• [SECURITY] SSL/TLS Validation Concern | SSL/TLS validation did not produce a clean result.
• [Contact Transparency] Only an email address is provided without a physical address or phone number.
• [DOMAIN AGE] Relatively Young Domain | The domain is relatively new compared with established services.
• [Legal Pages] Absence of privacy policy and terms of service raises transparency concerns.
• [Transparency] Lack of SPF and DMARC records suggests potential risks.

• [SECURITY] SSL/TLS Validation Concern | SSL/TLS validation did not produce a clean result.
• [CONTACT] Limited Contact Accountability | Contact accountability signals were limited on captured pages.
• [Domain Age] The domain age is unknown, which raises concerns about its legitimacy.
• [Legal Pages] Missing essential legal pages such as privacy policy and terms of service.
• [Transparency] No strong indicators of legitimacy such as SPF or DMARC records.

• {"type":"tls_warning","reason":"TLS certificate validation failed - security risk","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":45,"targetStatus":"warning"}
• {"type":"dns_missing","reason":"No DNS records found - domain may not be properly configured","scoreFloor":null,"scoreCeiling":30,"targetStatus":"warning"}
• {"type":"status_score_alignment","reason":"Status \"warning\" requires score = 40 (was 30); no deterministic scam evidence was present","scoreFloor":40,"scoreCeiling":null,"targetStatus":"warning"}

Is xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm a scam?

Yes, xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm shows warning signs and has a low trust score of 40/100.

Is xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm safe to use?

No, due to security issues and lack of contact transparency, xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm is not considered safe.

What are the red flags for xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm?

Red flags include SSL/TLS validation concerns, only an email for contact, and a relatively young domain.

What is the trust score of xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm?

xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm has a trust score of 40 out of 100.

Can I ignore the warnings for xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm?

It is advisable to take the warnings seriously and use caution when interacting with xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm.

How can I report xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm?

You can report xn--289ar2ubyal2b.kr/v1/index/index.htm to relevant consumer protection agencies if you suspect it is a scam.