← Back to Home

Is dmca-policy.com Legit or a Scam? Risk Score 28/100

Website: dmca-policy.com

Screenshot of dmca-policy.com

Safety Score How we score →

28/100
High Risk

Multiple strong risk indicators found.

Automated checks on November 2, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

Under review

A reviewer is checking this result; the score may change.

First analyzed Oct 30, 2026 · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict — free.

Ad

Every WordPress site you manage, watched from one console.

PowerSEC scans for malware and vulnerabilities, blocks attacks and brute-force logins, and keeps verified cloud backups for every site you run.

See PowerSEC

Why this score

  • Multiple strong risk indicators found.
  • Automated checks on November 2, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.
Final score
28/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
High Risk
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
28/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Confidence
Low
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • [DOMAIN] OBSERVED: The analyzed host is dmca-policy.com; official domain verified is false.
Caution signals
  • [IMPERSONATION RISK] INFERRED: YouTube-branded copyright review is presented on dmca-policy.com without verified official-domain status.
  • [DATA REQUEST] OBSERVED: The page requests a YouTube channel name or URL for a copyright-status check.
  • The page’s brand identity and account-status request need independent verification before you provide account information.
  • The evidence supports only a limited verdict.
  • An earlier high-risk result for this site could not be re-confirmed from a recorded finding; it is being reviewed.
Evidence summary
Confidence: Low
Evidence state: Known
Review status: Under Review

Analysis Results

Category: Copyright and account-status service
About this website:

Risk Assessment: YouTube Copyright Claim Review This is an AI assessment of the captured page; brand affiliations discussed here have not been independently verified. Website Overview and Purpose The page at dmca-policy.com is titled “YouTube — Copyright Claim Review” and presents a service to “Verify Your YouTube Copyright Status — Instant Secure Check.” It asks for an @channelname or channel URL and offers a “Check” action. The apparent audience is YouTube creators seeking information about copyright claims or channel status. Content Quality and User Experience The captured page is brief and focused on a single lookup. The screenshot shows YouTube-style branding, a prominent play-button mark, a channel identifier field, and a check button; these are observations of the rendered page, not proof of YouTube ownership. The text also lists accepted formats and multiple languages. No results, explanation of the review process, or supporting service details are available in the capture. Claims Verification and Red Flags The page uses YouTube’s name and presents a copyright-status check, while the analyzed domain is dmca-policy.com , not an identified YouTube domain. This mismatch, combined with the request for a channel identifier, supports concern that the page may be presenting an unofficial service as a YouTube-related review. The capture does not show a password request, payment demand, sanction threat, or credential submission, and the supplied credential-harvesting signal is negative. Therefore, this evidence does not establish credential theft or a confirmed phishing flow. Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Deterministic facts report valid SSL, no threat-intelligence hit, no redirect, and no verified official-domain status. These facts do not establish that the site is legitimate or affiliated with YouTube. The domain is reported as four days old, and no contact details or legal pages were detected in the supplied capture. Those are contextual limitations, not proof of fraud. A benign possibility is an independent tool or demonstration, but the page does not explain its operator or relationship to YouTube in the available content. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is warning with a trust score of 28/100 . Conclusion: The risk index is in the high-risk range, but the evidence on record does not establish a confirmed scam. Treat the site as high risk and verify any claim through the official service before sharing details or paying. Do not provide credentials or sensitive information. Check copyright status by navigating directly to YouTube through its official app or website; independently verify the operator before using this third-party page.

Risk Assessment: High Risk
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [EVIDENCE] Supplementary internal pages were not captured, so transparency evidence is limited in this run
  • [TRUST] Domain is relatively new (4 days), which increases uncertainty for high-trust interactions
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Contact accountability signals (address/phone/email/support page) were not clearly detected
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: missing, DMARC: missing)
  • [IMPERSONATION RISK] INFERRED: YouTube-branded copyright review is presented on dmca-policy.com without verified official-domain status.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [VISUAL] OBSERVED: The screenshot displays YouTube-style branding and a play-button mark alongside a copyright-review heading.
  • [DOMAIN] OBSERVED: The analyzed host is dmca-policy.com; official_domain_verified is false.
  • [REQUEST] OBSERVED: The page asks for an @channelname or channel URL and offers a “Check” action.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] OBSERVED: No contact details or legal pages were detected in the supplied evidence; the domain age is reported as four days.

What we could not check

  • Operator contact details: not found on the captured pages
  • Internal pages: not captured
  • Email authentication (SPF/DMARC): not published

Frequently asked questions about dmca-policy.com

Is dmca-policy.com a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on November 2, 2026 rated dmca-policy.com High Risk, 28/100. They did not establish a scam. Verify the site independently before paying.

Is dmca-policy.com safe?

ScamMinder rated dmca-policy.com High Risk, 28/100, on November 2, 2026. Multiple strong risk indicators found.

What is the trust score of dmca-policy.com?

dmca-policy.com has a ScamMinder trust score of 28/100 (High Risk) from automated checks on November 2, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.

Verdict history

  • — Caution (automated reanalysis)
  • — High Risk (automated reanalysis)
  • — High Risk (expert moderation)
  • — Caution (automated reanalysis)

Domain timeline

Dated facts about this domain, each with its source. The timeline is not part of the score.

  1. — Domain registered (Registrar: CNOBIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED) · Domain registry (RDAP)
  2. — Analysed by ScamMinder (automated reanalysis) · ScamMinder analyses
  3. — Analysed by ScamMinder (expert moderation) · ScamMinder analyses
  4. — Analysed by ScamMinder (automated reanalysis) · ScamMinder analyses

Sources: Registration data: the domain registry, via RDAP; ScamMinder analyses.

Regulator warning lists

Public warning lists published by financial regulators, matched on this domain. Facts and dates only; the lists are not part of the score.

Not found on the lists we read on Nov 2, 2026: AMF (France), BaFin (Germany), CFTC (United States), SEC (United States).

Could not be read: CONSOB (Italy).

Technical Details

Registrar: CNOBIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Domain Age: 4 days
TLS Certificate: Valid · issued by YE2 (DV) · expires in 86 days
Hosting: AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. (US)

IP address data powered by IPinfo

Email authentication: SPF missing · DMARC missing