← Back to Home

Is tcm15.com/new/1661638 Risky? 45/100 Trust Score

Website: tcm15.com/new/1661638

Screenshot of tcm15.com/new/1661638

Safety Score

45/100
Risky

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: unknown
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is tcm15.com/new/1661638 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose tcm15.com/new/1661638 was analyzed as a unknown website with General characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 45/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 45/100 in unknown (General). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 86 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are limited , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: Domain age is only 41 days, indicating a new and potentially untrustworthy site. | The website does not have a valid SSL certificate, which is essential for secure transactions. | No contact information is available, raising transparency concerns.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: No valid SSL certificate detected | Evidence: SSL check Finding: Missing contact information | Evidence: site content Finding: Newly registered domain | Evidence: domain age 41 days Finding: SPF record present but no DMARC record | Evidence: DNS check Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Contact transparency appears limited; avoid high-risk actions until accountable support channels are confirmed. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is not fully validated (issuer: not disclosed ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 41 day(s) based on rdap . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #2296817 , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the site before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [SECURITY] No valid SSL certificate detected | Evidence: SSL check
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Missing contact information | Evidence: site content
  • [DOMAIN] Newly registered domain | Evidence: domain age 41 days
  • [EMAIL] SPF record present but no DMARC record | Evidence: DNS check
  • [REPUTATION] Low global ranking | Evidence: Tranco rank #2,296,817
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN] Domain age is only 41 days, indicating a new and potentially untrustworthy site.
  • [SSL] The website does not have a valid SSL certificate, which is essential for secure transactions.
  • [CONTACT] No contact information is available, raising transparency concerns.
  • [SPF] The presence of an SPF record indicates some email verification, but the lack of a DMARC record is a concern.
  • [REPUTATION] The site has a low global rank of #2,296,817, suggesting limited traffic and visibility.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details