← Back to Home

coinfex.net Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Website: coinfex.net

Screenshot of coinfex.net

Safety Score

10/100
✗ Scam Risk

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Other
About this website:

The website https://coinfex.net appears to be a high-risk site based on the following observations: Domain Age: The domain is relatively new, being only 11 months and 10 days old. While this alone doesn't indicate a scam, it's a factor to consider. Website Content: The website's content was intentionally made inaccessible, suggesting that the site owner may have content they prefer search engines not to index. This is a red flag, as legitimate websites typically want their content to be easily accessible. Search Engine Results: A Google search yielded no information about the site in the search results. This lack of online presence is unusual for a legitimate business or service. Internet Archive: Wayback Machine Age: The site has a relatively short history on the Wayback Machine, with an age of 215 days. Legitimate websites often have a longer history of archiving. Server Information: The website is hosted on a server with the IP address 104.21.11.191, located in San Francisco, California. The use of a well-known hosting service like Cloudflare is not inherently suspicious, but it's worth noting. SSL Information: The SSL certificate for the site is issued by Google Trust Services, with the issuer listed as WE1. This is a standard SSL certificate, but it doesn't guarantee the legitimacy of the site. Overall, the combination of a new domain, intentionally inaccessible content, lack of search engine presence, and a relatively short history on the Wayback Machine raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of https://coinfex.net. It's advisable to exercise extreme caution and consider alternative, more established platforms for any financial or sensitive transactions."

Risk Assessment: scam
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • New domain, Intentionally inaccessible content, Lack of search engine presence, Short history on the Wayback Machine, Server location and SSL certificate not inherently suspicious, but worth noting.