← Back to Home

Is place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B

Website: place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80

Screenshot of place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80

Safety Score How we score β†’

55/100
Caution

place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 scores 55/100 (categorized as Web Application, a 343-day-old domain, 3 red flags recorded): review the findings below before trusting it.

First analyzed Sep 13, 2026 Β· Updated Sep 13, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict β€” free.

Why this score

  • Canonical verdict: Warning with a 55/100 final score.
  • Outcome confidence is Medium with Known evidence state.
Final score
55/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
Warning
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
55/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Score source
openai
Recorded by the canonical guardrail pipeline.
Confidence
Medium
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • SSL VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
Caution signals
  • CONTENT QUALITY The content appears corrupted or encoded, which may indicate poor maintenance or legitimacy issues.
  • CONTACT MISSING No contact information or legal pages are available, raising transparency concerns.
  • SUSPICIOUS SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected, indicating possible security risks.
Evidence summary
Confidence: Medium
Evidence state: Known
Review status: None

AI Analysis Results

Category: Web Application
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The analyzed page was the /p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 path rather than the homepage, so this report is anchored to that specific page experience. The scraped title was λ‹¬νŽ˜μ΄μ§€ β€” μ„œκ·€ν¬μ‹œ 색달동 카페 . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Service platform. Visible on-page text referenced λ‹¬νŽ˜μ΄μ§€ β€” μ„œκ·€ν¬μ‹œ 색달동 카페 Clario Sync Place 동넀 μ •ν•˜κΈ° 업체 검색 동넀 μ •ν•˜κΈ° 업체 검색 이야기 동넀 μ†Œμ‹ 자유 μˆ˜λ‹€ 동넀 ꢁ금증 동넀 기둝뢀 λΉ„μ¦ˆλ‹ˆμŠ€ λ‚˜λˆ”ν„° 골λͺ©λΉ„μ¦ˆ λ‚΄ 곡간 λ‚΄ 단골 λ‚΄ 발자ꡭ λ§ˆμ΄νŽ˜μ΄μ§€ 곡식 채널 μ„œλΉ„μŠ€ μ†Œκ°œ 곡지 amp; 이벀트 기술 λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έ Open API 동넀 μ†Œμ‹ 자유 μˆ˜λ‹€ 동넀 ꢁ금증 동넀 기둝뢀 ν™ˆ β€Ί μ œμ£ΌνŠΉλ³„μžμΉ˜λ„ β€Ί μ„œκ·€ν¬μ‹œ β€Ί 색달. . The content appears aimed at General users. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with Web Application and Platform characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The requested page path /p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 was preserved during scraping, so this review reflects that specific page rather than a generic homepage substitute. The scraped title was λ‹¬νŽ˜μ΄μ§€ β€” μ„œκ·€ν¬μ‹œ 색달동 카페 , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Service platform. The page appears aimed at General users. No additional internal page content was needed for a baseline view of the visible experience. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were limited and policy signals were present . Additional observed context from the analysis included: Deterministic phishing signal detected before canonical scoring: typosquatting Slack (levenshtein) | DOMAIN_AGE The domain is only 343 days old, which is relatively new and may indicate a lack of established trust | SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content appears commercially transactional and is trying to move the visitor toward a purchase or service-order flow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: CONTENT_QUALITY The content appears corrupted or encoded, which may indicate poor maintenance or legitimacy issues. Finding: CONTACT_MISSING No contact information or legal pages are available, raising transparency concerns. Finding: SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected, indicating possible security risks. Caution Points Treat the page as a commercial offer: verify pricing, refund rules, payment handling, and dispute options before paying. Read the available privacy or policy pages to understand liability, support scope, and what data the operator says it collects. Contact transparency appears limited, so treat support and dispute recovery as uncertain until independently verified. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: WE1 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 343 day(s) based on rdap_phase_a . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #4084639 , and visible transparency signals are limited for contact details and present for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in Web Application (Platform). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution when using this platform and verify its legitimacy before providing any personal information.

Risk Assessment: Caution
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • CONTENT_QUALITY The content appears corrupted or encoded, which may indicate poor maintenance or legitimacy issues.
  • CONTACT_MISSING No contact information or legal pages are available, raising transparency concerns.
  • SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration path detected, indicating possible security risks.
πŸ“Š Analysis Reasons:
  • DOMAIN_AGE The domain is only 343 days old, which is relatively new and may indicate a lack of established trust.
  • SSL_VALID The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • SPF_RECORD Missing SPF records can lead to email spoofing risks.
  • DMARC_RECORD The absence of DMARC records raises concerns about email security.
  • CONTACT_TRANSPARENCY There is no visible contact information or legal pages, which diminishes transparency.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Frequently asked questions about place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80

Is place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 a scam?

Yes, there are warning signs indicating potential issues with place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80.

Is place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 safe to use?

Caution is advised as place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80 has a trust score of 55/100.

What are the red flags for place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80?

Red flags include corrupted content and missing contact information.

Why should I be cautious with place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80?

The site shows signs of poor maintenance and potential security risks.

What is the trust score of place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80?

The trust score is 55 out of 100, indicating moderate risk.

Can I find reviews for place.clariosync.com/p/6492041/%EB%8B%AC%ED%8E%98%EC%9D%B4%EC%A7%80?

Yes, but be aware of the site's questionable legitimacy.

Verdict history

  • β€” Warning (automated reanalysis)

Technical Details

Registrar: Gabia, Inc.
Domain Age: 343 days
TLS Certificate: Valid Β· issued by WE1 (DV) Β· expires in 56 days
Hosting: AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. (US)
Email authentication: SPF missing Β· DMARC missing