← Back to Home

Is store.powereditemworkspace.com/sharedfiles/filedetails Risky? 40/100 Trust Score

Website: store.powereditemworkspace.com/sharedfiles/filedetails

Screenshot of store.powereditemworkspace.com/sharedfiles/filedetails

Safety Score

40/100
Risky

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

AI Analysis Results

Category: Gaming
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is store.powereditemworkspace.com/sharedfiles/filedetails Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose store.powereditemworkspace.com/sharedfiles/filedetails was analyzed as a Gaming website with Modifications characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 40/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 40/100 in Gaming (Modifications). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 4379 characters. Supplementary coverage included 0 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are limited . Additional analysis signals included: Domain age is only 2 days, indicating a new and potentially untrustworthy site. | No SPF or DMARC records found, which are essential for email security and legitimacy. | No verified contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service available.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: New domain age of 2 days raises suspicion about legitimacy. Finding: Missing contact information and legal pages, indicating poor transparency. Finding: Absence of SPF and DMARC records, which are common in fraudulent sites. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Policy pages were not clearly detected in this scan; request transparent legal terms before transacting. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: E8 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 2 day(s) based on rdap_phase_a . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the site before engaging.

Risk Assessment: warning
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [DOMAIN] New domain age of 2 days raises suspicion about legitimacy.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] Missing contact information and legal pages, indicating poor transparency.
  • [SECURITY] Absence of SPF and DMARC records, which are common in fraudulent sites.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • [DOMAIN] Domain age is only 2 days, indicating a new and potentially untrustworthy site.
  • [SECURITY] No SPF or DMARC records found, which are essential for email security and legitimacy.
  • [TRANSPARENCY] No verified contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service available.
  • [REPUTATION] The site is not ranked on Tranco, suggesting low visibility and trust in the community.
  • [BRAND] Claims association with Valve Corporation but lacks official verification or evidence.
🏢 Brand Evidence:
  • No official verification of the brand claim.
Score Source: openai
AI Confidence: medium

Technical Details