Is sportzx.cc/sportzx-live Risky? 55/100 Trust Score

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

Detailed Analysis Report: Is sportzx.cc/sportzx-live Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose sportzx.cc/sportzx-live was analyzed as a Streaming Services website with Sports Streaming characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is warning with a trust score of 55/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: warning with score 55/100 in Streaming Services (Sports Streaming). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 476 characters. Supplementary coverage included 2 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are present . Additional analysis signals included: The domain is only 190 days old, indicating it is relatively new and may lack established credibility. | The site has been flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors, which raises concerns about security. | While contact pages exist, they do not provide a physical address or phone number, which limits transparency.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected The scan identified concrete risk indicators that should be reviewed before trusting this domain. Finding: VirusTotal flagged the site as malicious | Evidence: VirusTotal report Finding: Missing physical address and phone number | Evidence: Contact page Finding: Domain is only 190 days old | Evidence: RDAP data Finding: No SPF record found | Evidence: DNS records Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Read the available policy/terms pages carefully for refund, dispute, and liability terms. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: WE1 ), VirusTotal reports 1/95 detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 190 day(s) based on rdap . Reputation telemetry shows Tranco rank #396441 , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show 1 malicious engine detection(s), and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution when using this site and verify the legitimacy of the streams before engaging.

• [SECURITY] VirusTotal flagged the site as malicious | Evidence: VirusTotal report
• [TRANSPARENCY] Missing physical address and phone number | Evidence: Contact page
• [DOMAIN AGE] Domain is only 190 days old | Evidence: RDAP data
• [EMAIL AUTHENTICATION] No SPF record found | Evidence: DNS records
• [EMAIL AUTHENTICATION] No DMARC record found | Evidence: DNS records

• [DOMAIN AGE] The domain is only 190 days old, indicating it is relatively new and may lack established credibility.
• [VIRUSTOTAL] The site has been flagged as malicious by 1 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors, which raises concerns about security.
• [CONTACT TRANSPARENCY] While contact pages exist, they do not provide a physical address or phone number, which limits transparency.
• [SPF RECORD] The absence of an SPF record suggests a lack of email authentication, which is a common practice for legitimate businesses.
• [DMARC RECORD] The lack of a DMARC record indicates potential vulnerabilities in email security.