Is blockchain-sh.de Safe? 69/100 Trust Score

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

Detailed Analysis Report: Is blockchain-sh.de Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose blockchain-sh.de was analyzed as a Non-Profit Organization website with Blockchain Technology characteristics. This assessment combines automated technical checks, threat-intelligence signals, and scraped on-page content to estimate practical user risk. The current result is safe with a trust score of 85/100 . This should be treated as an evidence-driven safety snapshot, not a legal certification, and confidence depends on how complete the available signals are for ownership, transparency, and security controls. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights Primary classification from this run: safe with score 85/100 in Non-Profit Organization (Blockchain Technology). Technical evidence reviewed includes DNS, SSL, WHOIS/RDAP/CT age evidence, WebRisk, VirusTotal, and a live scrape of approximately 12459 characters. Supplementary coverage included 1 additional internal page(s), improving visibility into contact/legal signals when available. Observed transparency posture: contact signals are present , policy signals are present . Additional analysis signals included: Domain registered for over 4 years, indicating stability and commitment. | SSL certificate is valid, ensuring secure connections for users. | The organization is registered as a non-profit, enhancing its credibility.. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected No deterministic scam signal was confirmed, but the confidence profile remains cautionary based on available evidence. No high-confidence explicit red flags were returned by the model in this run; caution is still warranted where verification gaps exist. Caution Points Verify that branding, ownership details, and support channels match an official source before sharing sensitive information. Read the available policy/terms pages carefully for refund, dispute, and liability terms. Use listed contact channels to validate response quality before any payment or account action. Prefer low-risk interaction first and escalate trust only after independent verification. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: R12 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is missing , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Domain age evidence indicates 4 year(s) based on ct_logs . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , which should be interpreted alongside business context rather than in isolation. Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, and no single signal should be treated as conclusive by itself. Strong legitimacy normally requires alignment across age, contact accountability, policy transparency, and consistent brand identity. Final Verdict and Recommendations Conclusion: Evidence currently leans toward legitimate operation, but routine verification should still be applied. Engage with the community and verify event details before participation.

• [GUARDRAIL] Applied category risk policy (general) warning cap
• [GUARDRAIL] Domain is unranked in Tranco (no significant traffic) - high trust score requires verification

• [DOMAIN HISTORY] Domain registered for over 4 years, indicating stability and commitment.
• [SECURITY] SSL certificate is valid, ensuring secure connections for users.
• [REPUTATION] The organization is registered as a non-profit, enhancing its credibility.
• [CONTENT QUALITY] Professional design and informative content about blockchain technology.
• [TRANSPARENCY] Deterministic contact/legal links and contact details were detected from captured pages.

• Website explicitly states 'Blockchain Association Schleswig-Holstein e.V.'
• Contact information and organizational details are clearly presented.

• {"type":"tranco_unranked","reason":"Domain is unranked in Tranco (no significant traffic) - high trust score requires verification","scoreCeiling":70,"targetStatus":"warning"}
• {"type":"risk_policy_warning_cap","reason":"Applied category risk policy (general) warning cap","scoreCeiling":69,"targetStatus":"warning"}