badan.cc Scam Check: 10/100 Trust | ScamMinder

Exercise caution when interacting with this website.

The website badan.cc appears to be a scam. Several red flags indicate this: 1. **Domain Age:** The domain is very new, which is a common tactic for scam websites. It was registered less than 2 months ago, which is a short period for a legitimate business. 2. **Domain Whois:** The domain's whois information is hidden. While not necessarily a definitive sign of a scam, it's often a tactic used by fraudulent websites to conceal their identities. 3. **SSL Certificate:** The SSL certificate is from Let's Encrypt, which is a legitimate certificate authority. However, the type of certificate is only Domain Validated (DV), which provides the lowest level of validation. Many legitimate businesses use higher levels of validation for their SSL certificates. 4. **Server Location:** The server is located in San Francisco, California, which may not match the expected location of the business. This could be a sign of a fake or misleading location. 5. **Content Errors:** The content you provided indicates errors on the website, which is unprofessional and could be a sign of a hastily put together, potentially fraudulent site. 6. **Lack of Information:** If the website lacks detailed information about the company, its team, or its products/services, it's a red flag. Legitimate businesses usually provide this information to build trust with customers. 7. **No Archive History:** The website has no history in the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. While this isn't always a sign of a scam, it's unusual for legitimate websites not to have any historical snapshots. Based on these factors, it's advisable to exercise extreme caution when dealing with this website. It's recommended to thoroughly research the company, look for independent reviews, and consider alternative, more established businesses for any transactions or interactions."

• New domain, Hidden whois information, Low-level SSL certificate, Server location mismatch, Content errors, Lack of detailed information, No archive history